Abstract
Animals may share food to gain immediate or delayed fitness benefits. Previous studies of sharing have concentrated on delayed benefits such as reciprocity, trade and punishment. This study tests an alternative model (the harassment or sharing-under-pressure hypothesis) in which a food owner immediately benefits because sharing avoids costly harassment from a beggar. I present an experiment that varies the potential ability of the beggar to harass, and of the owner to defend the food, to examine the effects of harassment on food sharing in two primate species: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis). For both species, high levels of harassment potential significantly increased both beggar harassment and sharing by the owner. Food defensibility did not affect harassment or sharing. Interestingly, squirrel monkeys and chimpanzees shared equally frequently with conspecifics despite a much higher natural sharing rate in chimpanzees. These results suggest that harassment can play a significant role in primate food sharing, providing a simple alternative to reciprocity. The selfish nature of harassment has implications for economic, psychological and evolutionary studies of cooperative systems.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (105.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Boyd Robert, Gintis Herbert, Bowles Samuel, Richerson Peter J. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 11;100(6):3531–3535. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630443100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clutton-Brock T. H., O'Riain M. J., Brotherton P. N., Gaynor D., Kansky R., Griffin A. S., Manser M. Selfish sentinels in cooperative mammals. Science. 1999 Jun 4;284(5420):1640–1644. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5420.1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clutton-Brock T. H., Parker G. A. Punishment in animal societies. Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):209–216. doi: 10.1038/373209a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gintis H. Strong reciprocity and human sociality. J Theor Biol. 2000 Sep 21;206(2):169–179. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hauser Marc D., Chen M. Keith, Chen Frances, Chuang Emmeline. Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 22;270(1531):2363–2370. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henrich J., Boyd R. Why people punish defectors. Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. J Theor Biol. 2001 Jan 7;208(1):79–89. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mesterton-gibbons M, Dugatkin LA. Cooperation and the Prisoner's Dilemma: towards testable models of mutualism versus reciprocity. Anim Behav. 1997 Sep;54(3):551–557. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stanford C. B., Wallis J., Matama H., Goodall J. Patterns of predation by chimpanzees on red colobus monkeys in Gombe National Park, 1982-1991. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994 Jun;94(2):213–228. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330940206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stephens D. W., McLinn C. M., Stevens J. R. Discounting and reciprocity in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. Science. 2002 Dec 13;298(5601):2216–2218. doi: 10.1126/science.1078498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Waal F. B. Food transfers through mesh in brown capuchins. J Comp Psychol. 1997 Dec;111(4):370–378. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.111.4.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]