Abstract
Many studies have demonstrated the adaptive advantage of elaborate secondary sexual traits, but few if any have shown compelling evidence for the limits to the elaboration of these traits that must exist. We describe such evidence in the exaggerated mandibles of stag beetles. In 1932, Huxley showed that the slope of the allometric relationship between mandible length and body size in some stag beetles declines in the largest males. We show that this curvature is most pronounced in species with relatively long mandibles, consistent with the hypothesis that the decrease in slope is caused by the increasing costs of large mandibles, which ultimately limit their size. Increasing depletion of resources in the prepupa and pupa by the rapidly growing mandibles is the most likely way in which these costs are manifested. The curved allometries have two components: intraspecific mandible allometry is steepest among small males of the species with the longest mandibles, but shallowest among the largest males of those same species. These patterns suggest that selection continues to favour positive allometry in species that invest relatively more in weaponry despite the limits to mandible exaggeration being reached in the largest males.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (456.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker R. H., Wilkinson G. S. Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eye-span allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution. 2001 Jul;55(7):1373–1385. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00659.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brogiolo W., Stocker H., Ikeya T., Rintelen F., Fernandez R., Hafen E. An evolutionarily conserved function of the Drosophila insulin receptor and insulin-like peptides in growth control. Curr Biol. 2001 Feb 20;11(4):213–221. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00068-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emlen D. J. Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures. Science. 2001 Feb 23;291(5508):1534–1536. doi: 10.1126/science.1056607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emlen D. J., Nijhout H. F. The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:661–708. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goberdhan Deborah C. I., Wilson Clive. The functions of insulin signaling: size isn't everything, even in Drosophila. Differentiation. 2003 Sep;71(7):375–397. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2003.7107001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gould S. J. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1966 Nov;41(4):587–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1966.tb01624.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Housworth E. A., Martins E. P. Random sampling of constrained phylogenies: conducting phylogenetic analyses when the phylogeny is partially known. Syst Biol. 2001 Sep-Oct;50(5):628–639. doi: 10.1080/106351501753328776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ikeya Tomoatsu, Galic Milos, Belawat Priyanka, Nairz Knud, Hafen Ernst. Nutrient-dependent expression of insulin-like peptides from neuroendocrine cells in the CNS contributes to growth regulation in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2002 Aug 6;12(15):1293–1300. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01043-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nijhout H. F., Emlen D. J. Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31;95(7):3685–3689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nijhout H. F. The control of body size in insects. Dev Biol. 2003 Sep 1;261(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00276-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Smith J. M., Brown R. L. Competition and body size. Theor Popul Biol. 1986 Oct;30(2):166–179. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(86)90031-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stevens D. J., Hansell M. H., Monaghan P. Developmental trade-offs and life histories: strategic allocation of resources in caddis flies. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Aug 7;267(1452):1511–1515. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swallow J. G., Wilkinson G. S., Marden J. H. Aerial performance of stalk-eyed flies that differ in eye span. J Comp Physiol B. 2000 Nov;170(7):481–487. doi: 10.1007/s003600000124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]