Abstract
It is widely agreed that the flowers of hermaphrodite plants evolve in response to selection acting simultaneously through male and female sexual functions, but we know very little about the pattern of gender-specific selection. We review three current hypotheses for gender-specific selection by viewing them within a single phenotypic selection framework. We compile data from phenotypic selection and manipulative studies and evaluate the fit between empirical data and the hypotheses. In this preliminary analysis, we find that neither the male-function hypothesis nor the gender-balance hypothesis is well supported. However, the context-dependence hypothesis is supported by the documented diversity of gender-specific selection and by evidence that selection through female fertility is significantly correlated with pollen limitation of seed production. Future studies contributing to our understanding of selection through male and female function in plants need to quantify and manipulate the ecological context for reproduction, as well as describe male and female fitness responses to fine-scale trait manipulation.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Alexandersson Ronny, Johnson Steven D. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower-tube length in a hawkmoth-pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 22;269(1491):631–636. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burczyk J., Adams W. T., Moran G. F., Griffin A. R. Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Mol Ecol. 2002 Nov;11(11):2379–2391. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell DR. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jun;15(6):227–232. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01872-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caruso C. M. Competition for pollination influences selection on floral traits of Ipomopsis aggregata. Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1546–1557. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00700.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conner Jeffrey K., Rice Amber M., Stewart Christy, Morgan Martin T. Patterns and mechanisms of selection on a family-diagnostic trait: evidence from experimental manipulation and lifetime fitness selection gradients. Evolution. 2003 Mar;57(3):480–486. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maad J. Phenotypic selection in hawkmoth-pollinated Platanthera bifolia: targets and fitness surfaces. Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):112–123. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan M. T., Conner J. K. Using genetic markers to directly estimate male selection gradients. Evolution. 2001 Feb;55(2):272–281. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01292.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niovi Jones K., Reithel J. S. Pollinator-mediated selection on a flower color polymorphism in experimental populations of Antirrhinum (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot. 2001 Mar;88(3):447–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Podolsky R. D. Strange floral attractors: pollinator attraction and the evolution of plant sexual systems. Science. 1992 Oct 30;258(5083):791–793. doi: 10.1126/science.258.5083.791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sakai S., Harada Y. Sink-limitation and the size-number trade-off of organs: production of organs using a fixed amount of reserves. Evolution. 2001 Mar;55(3):467–476. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0467:slatsn]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vilca Melendez H., Rela M., Murphy G., Heaton N. Liver transplantation and bile analysis: a parallel evolution. Transplantation. 1998 May 27;65(10):1289–1293. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199805270-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]