Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Mar 22;271(1539):603–608. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2644

Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in angiosperms.

Risa D Sargent 1
PMCID: PMC1691633  PMID: 15156918

Abstract

Despite much recent activity in the field of pollination biology, the extent to which animal pollinators drive the formation of new angiosperm species remains unresolved. One problem has been identifying floral adaptations that promote reproductive isolation. The evolution of a bilaterally symmetrical corolla restricts the direction of approach and movement of pollinators on and between flowers. Restricting pollinators to approaching a flower from a single direction facilitates specific placement of pollen on the pollinator. When coupled with pollinator constancy, precise pollen placement can increase the probability that pollen grains reach a compatible stigma. This has the potential to generate reproductive isolation between species, because mutations that cause changes in the placement of pollen on the pollinator may decrease gene flow between incipient species. I predict that animal-pollinated lineages that possess bilaterally symmetrical flowers should have higher speciation rates than lineages possessing radially symmetrical flowers. Using sister-group comparisons I demonstrate that bilaterally symmetric lineages tend to be more species rich than their radially symmetrical sister lineages. This study supports an important role for pollinator-mediated speciation and demonstrates that floral morphology plays a key role in angiosperm speciation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (96.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barraclough T. G., Savolainen V. Evolutionary rates and species diversity in flowering plants. Evolution. 2001 Apr;55(4):677–683. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0677:erasdi]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Endress P. K. Antirrhinum and Asteridae--evolutionary changes of floral symmetry. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1998;51:133–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grant V. Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jan 4;91(1):3–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.1.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hodges S. A., Arnold M. L. Floral and ecological isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 29;91(7):2493–2496. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnson SD, Steiner KE. Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Apr;15(4):140–143. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01811-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. Regal P. J. Ecology and evolution of flowering plant dominance. Science. 1977 May 6;196(4290):622–629. doi: 10.1126/science.196.4290.622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schluter D. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):372–380. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02198-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Verdú Miguel. Age at maturity and diversification in woody angiosperms. Evolution. 2002 Jul;56(7):1352–1361. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01449.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES