Abstract
Bates hypothesized that some butterfly species that are palatable gain protection from predation by appearing similar to distasteful butterflies. When undisturbed, distasteful butterflies fly slowly and in a straight line, and palatable Batesian mimics also adopt this nonchalant behaviour. When seized by predators, distasteful butterflies are defended by toxic or nauseous chemicals. Lacking chemical defences, Batesian mimics depend on flight to escape attacks. Here, I demonstrate that flight in warning-coloured mimetic butterflies and their distasteful models is more costly than in closely related non-mimetic butterflies. The increased cost is the result of differences in both wing shape and kinematics. Batesian mimics and their models slow the angular velocity of their wings to enhance the colour signal but at an aerodynamic cost. Moreover, the design for flight in Batesian mimics has an additional energetic cost over that of its models. The added cost may cause Batesian mimics to be rare, explaining a general pattern that Bates first observed.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (406.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Lindström L., Alatalo R. V., Lyytinen A., Mappes J. Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(16):9181–9184. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161071598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Sherratt Thomas N., Beatty Christopher D. The evolution of warning signals as reliable indicators of prey defense. Am Nat. 2003 Oct 16;162(4):377–389. doi: 10.1086/378047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherratt Thomas N., Rashed Arash, Beatty Christopher D. The evolution of locomotory behavior in profitable and unprofitable simulated prey. Oecologia. 2003 Oct 16;138(1):143–150. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1411-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherratt Thomas N. The coevolution of warning signals. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 7;269(1492):741–746. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wahlberg N. The phylogenetics and biochemistry of host-plant specialization in Melitaeine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution. 2001 Mar;55(3):522–537. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0522:tpaboh]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willmott A. P., Ellington C. P. The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation. J Exp Biol. 1997 Nov;200(Pt 21):2723–2745. doi: 10.1242/jeb.200.21.2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zahavi A. The fallacy of conventional signalling. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993 May 29;340(1292):227–230. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1993.0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]