Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Apr 7;271(1540):761–770. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2637

Evidence for an elastic projection mechanism in the chameleon tongue.

Jurriaan H de Groot 1, Johan L van Leeuwen 1
PMCID: PMC1691657  PMID: 15209111

Abstract

To capture prey, chameleons ballistically project their tongues as far as 1.5 body lengths with accelerations of up to 500 m s(-2). At the core of a chameleon's tongue is a cylindrical tongue skeleton surrounded by the accelerator muscle. Previously, the cylindrical accelerator muscle was assumed to power tongue projection directly during the actual fast projection of the tongue. However, high-speed recordings of Chamaeleo melleri and C. pardalis reveal that peak powers of 3000 W kg(-1) are necessary to generate the observed accelerations, which exceed the accelerator muscle's capacity by at least five- to 10-fold. Extrinsic structures might power projection via the tongue skeleton. High-speed fluoroscopy suggests that they contribute less than 10% of the required peak instantaneous power. Thus, the projection power must be generated predominantly within the tongue, and an energy-storage-and-release mechanism must be at work. The key structure in the projection mechanism is probably a cylindrical connective-tissue layer, which surrounds the entoglossal process and was previously suggested to act as lubricating tissue. This tissue layer comprises at least 10 sheaths that envelop the entoglossal process. The outer portion connects anteriorly to the accelerator muscle and the inner portion to the retractor structures. The sheaths contain helical arrays of collagen fibres. Prior to projection, the sheaths are longitudinally loaded by the combined radial contraction and hydrostatic lengthening of the accelerator muscle, at an estimated mean power of 144 W kg(-1) in C. melleri. Tongue projection is triggered as the accelerator muscle and the loaded portions of the sheaths start to slide over the tip of the entoglossal process. The springs relax radially while pushing off the rounded tip of the entoglossal process, making the elastic energy stored in the helical fibres available for a simultaneous forward acceleration of the tongue pad, accelerator muscle and retractor structures. The energy release continues as the multilayered spring slides over the tip of the smooth and lubricated entoglossal process. This sliding-spring theory predicts that the sheaths deliver most of the instantaneous power required for tongue projection. The release power of the sliding tubular springs exceeds the work rate of the accelerator muscle by at least a factor of 10 because the elastic-energy release occurs much faster than the loading process. Thus, we have identified a unique catapult mechanism that is very different from standard engineering designs. Our morphological and kinematic observations, as well as the available literature data, are consistent with the proposed mechanism of tongue projection, although experimental tests of the sheath strain and the lubrication of the entoglossal process are currently beyond our technical scope.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (613.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Askew G. N., Marsh R. L. The mechanical power output of the pectoralis muscle of blue-breasted quail (Coturnix chinensis): the in vivo length cycle and its implications for muscle performance. J Exp Biol. 2001 Nov;204(Pt 21):3587–3600. doi: 10.1242/jeb.204.21.3587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harkness L. Chameleons use accommodation cues to judge distance. Nature. 1977 May 26;267(5609):346–349. doi: 10.1038/267346a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Herrel A., Meyers J. J., Aerts P., Nishikawa K. C. Functional implications of supercontracting muscle in the chameleon tongue retractors. J Exp Biol. 2001 Nov;204(Pt 21):3621–3627. doi: 10.1242/jeb.204.21.3621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Herrel A., Meyers J. J., Aerts P., Nishikawa K. C. The mechanics of prey prehension in chameleons. J Exp Biol. 2000 Nov;203(Pt 21):3255–3263. doi: 10.1242/jeb.203.21.3255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herrel A., Meyers J. J., Nishikawa K. C., De Vree F. Morphology and histochemistry of the hyolingual apparatus in chameleons. J Morphol. 2001 Aug;249(2):154–170. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ker R. F. The design of soft collagenous load-bearing tissues. J Exp Biol. 1999 Dec;202(Pt 23):3315–3324. doi: 10.1242/jeb.202.23.3315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kier W, Leeuwen J. A kinematic analysis of tentacle extension in the squid Loligo pealei. J Exp Biol. 1997;200(Pt 1):41–53. doi: 10.1242/jeb.200.1.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lombard R. E., Wake D. B. Tongue evolution in the lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae. II. Function and evolutionary diversity. J Morphol. 1977 Jul;153(1):39–79. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051530104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lutz G. J., Rome L. C. Built for jumping: the design of the frog muscular system. Science. 1994 Jan 21;263(5145):370–372. doi: 10.1126/science.8278808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meyers J. J., Nishikawa K. C. Comparative study of tongue protrusion in three iguanian lizards, Sceloporus undulatus, Pseudotrapelus sinaitus and Chamaeleo jacksonii. J Exp Biol. 2000 Sep;203(Pt 18):2833–2849. doi: 10.1242/jeb.203.18.2833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ott M., Schaeffel F. A negatively powered lens in the chameleon. Nature. 1995 Feb 23;373(6516):692–694. doi: 10.1038/373692a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  13. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rice M. J. Supercontracting striated muscle in a vertebrate. Nature. 1973 May 25;243(5404):238–240. doi: 10.1038/243238a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Snelderwaard Peter Ch, De Groot Jurriaan H., Deban Stephan M. Digital video combined with conventional radiography creates an excellent high-speed X-ray video system. J Biomech. 2002 Jul;35(7):1007–1009. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00035-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stear M. J., Bairden K., Duncan J. L., Holmes P. H., McKellar Q. A., Park M., Strain S., Murray M., Bishop S. C., Gettinby G. How hosts control worms. Nature. 1997 Sep 4;389(6646):27–27. doi: 10.1038/37895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
15209111s01.pdf (177.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES