Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Apr 22;271(1541):869–874. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2662

Allele excess at neutrally evolving microsatellites and the implications for tests of neutrality.

Christian Schlötterer 1, Max Kauer 1, Daniel Dieringer 1
PMCID: PMC1691660  PMID: 15255107

Abstract

Skews in the observed allele-frequency spectrum are frequently viewed as an indication of non-neutral evolution. Recent surveys of microsatellite variability have used an excess of alleles as a statistical approach to infer positive selection. Using neutral coalescent simulations we demonstrate that the mean numbers of alleles expected under the stepwise-mutation model and infinite-allele model deviate from the observed numbers of alleles. The magnitude of this difference is dependent on the sample size, mutation rates (theta-values) and observed gene diversities. Moreover, we show that the number of observed alleles differs among loci with the same observed gene diversity but different mutation rates (theta-values). We propose that a reliable test statistic based on allele excess must determine the confidence interval by computer simulations conditional on the observed gene diversity and theta-values. As the latter are notoriously difficult to obtain for experimental data, we suggest that other statistics, such as lnRV, may be better suited to the identification of microsatellite loci subject to selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (124.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N. H. Genetic hitchhiking. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Nov 29;355(1403):1553–1562. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caracristi G., Schlötterer C. Genetic differentiation between American and European Drosophila melanogaster populations could be attributed to admixture of African alleles. Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Apr 2;20(5):792–799. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cornuet J. M., Luikart G. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):2001–2014. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Di Rienzo A., Peterson A. C., Garza J. C., Valdes A. M., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 12;91(8):3166–3170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellegren H. Microsatellite mutations in the germline: implications for evolutionary inference. Trends Genet. 2000 Dec;16(12):551–558. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02139-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Estoup A., Garnery L., Solignac M., Cornuet J. M. Microsatellite variation in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) populations: hierarchical genetic structure and test of the infinite allele and stepwise mutation models. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):679–695. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goldstein D. B., Zhivotovsky L. A., Nayar K., Linares A. R., Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Feldman M. W. Statistical properties of the variation at linked microsatellite loci: implications for the history of human Y chromosomes. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Nov;13(9):1213–1218. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harr B., Zangerl B., Brem G., Schlötterer C. Conservation of locus-specific microsatellite variability across species: a comparison of two Drosophila sibling species, D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Feb;15(2):176–184. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kauer M. O., Dieringer D., Schlötterer C. A microsatellite variability screen for positive selection associated with the "out of Africa" habitat expansion of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2003 Nov;165(3):1137–1148. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.3.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kimura M., Ohta T. Distribution of allelic frequencies in a finite population under stepwise production of neutral alleles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jul;72(7):2761–2764. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.7.2761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Michalakis Y., Veuille M. Length variation of CAG/CAA trinucleotide repeats in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and its relation to the recombination rate. Genetics. 1996 Aug;143(4):1713–1725. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.4.1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Otto S. P. Detecting the form of selection from DNA sequence data. Trends Genet. 2000 Dec;16(12):526–529. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02141-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Payseur Bret A., Cutter Asher D., Nachman Michael W. Searching for evidence of positive selection in the human genome using patterns of microsatellite variability. Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jul;19(7):1143–1153. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schlötterer C. Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite DNA. Chromosoma. 2000 Sep;109(6):365–371. doi: 10.1007/s004120000089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schlötterer Christian. A microsatellite-based multilocus screen for the identification of local selective sweeps. Genetics. 2002 Feb;160(2):753–763. doi: 10.1093/genetics/160.2.753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schlötterer Christian. Hitchhiking mapping--functional genomics from the population genetics perspective. Trends Genet. 2003 Jan;19(1):32–38. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(02)00012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schlötterer Christian. The evolution of molecular markers--just a matter of fashion? Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Jan;5(1):63–69. doi: 10.1038/nrg1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shriver M. D., Jin L., Chakraborty R., Boerwinkle E. VNTR allele frequency distributions under the stepwise mutation model: a computer simulation approach. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):983–993. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vigouroux Y., McMullen M., Hittinger C. T., Houchins K., Schulz L., Kresovich S., Matsuoka Y., Doebley J. Identifying genes of agronomic importance in maize by screening microsatellites for evidence of selection during domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 8;99(15):9650–9655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.112324299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vigouroux Yves, Jaqueth Jennifer S., Matsuoka Yoshihiro, Smith Oscar S., Beavis William D., Smith J. Stephen C., Doebley John. Rate and pattern of mutation at microsatellite loci in maize. Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Aug;19(8):1251–1260. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES