Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 May 7;271(1542):919–924. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2682

Age and size at maturity: sex, environmental variability and developmental thresholds.

Stewart J Plaistow 1, Craig T Lapsley 1, Andrew P Beckerman 1, Tim G Benton 1
PMCID: PMC1691673  PMID: 15255046

Abstract

In most organisms, transitions between different life-history stages occur later and at smaller sizes as growth conditions deteriorate. Day and Rowe recently proposed that this pattern could be explained by the existence of developmental thresholds (minimum sizes or levels of condition below which transitions are unable to proceed). The developmental-threshold model predicts that the reaction norm of age and size at maturity will rotate in an anticlockwise manner from positive to a shallow negative slope if: (i) initial body size or condition is reduced; and/or (ii) some individuals encounter poor growth conditions at increasingly early developmental stages. We tested these predictions by rearing replicated populations of soil mites Sancassania berlesei (Michael) under different growth conditions. High-food environments produced a vertical relationship between age and size at maturity. The slope became increasingly shallow as food was reduced. By contrast, high food in the maternal environment reduced the slope of the reaction norm of age and size at maturity, whereas low food increased it. Overall, the reaction norm of age and size at maturity in S. berlesei was significantly nonlinear and differed for males and females. We describe how growth conditions, mother's environment and sex determine age and size at maturity in S. berlesei.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (950.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beckerman Andrew P., Benton Tim G., Lapsley Craig T., Koesters Nils. Talkin' 'bout my generation: environmental variability and cohort effects. Am Nat. 2003 Dec 4;162(6):754–767. doi: 10.1086/381056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bedhomme S., Agnew P., Sidobre C., Michalakis Y. Sex-specific reaction norms to intraspecific larval competition in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Evol Biol. 2003 Jul;16(4):721–730. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00576.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fox C. W., Czesak M. E. Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:341–369. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Post E., Langvatn R., Forchhammer M. C., Stenseth N. C. Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 13;96(8):4467–4471. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES