Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 May 7;271(1542):949–955. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2690

A receiver bias in the origin of three-spined stickleback mate choice.

Carl Smith 1, Iain Barber 1, Robert J Wootton 1, Lars Chittka 1
PMCID: PMC1691680  PMID: 15255050

Abstract

Receiver-bias models of signal evolution predict that male sexually selected traits evolve through prior selection for other functions. Female three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in many populations show a mating preference for males with a red throat and jaw. It has been proposed that this preference evolved because the choice of males with red coloration confers direct and indirect benefits to females in accordance with the Fisher-Zahavi model of sexual selection. We present indirect evidence that the preference is an effect of a receiver bias in the perceptual or cognitive system of G. aculeatus for the colour red, which may have arisen in the context of foraging. In laboratory trials, male and female three-spined and nine-spined sticklebacks (Pungitius pungitius) responded most strongly to red objects outside a mating context. This result demonstrates a correlation between a sexually selected trait and an intrinsic attraction to red objects, and supports the sensory-exploitation model for the evolution of red nuptial coloration in three-spined sticklebacks.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (149.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barber I., Arnott S. A., Braithwaite V. A., Andrew J., Huntingford F. A. Indirect fitness consequences of mate choice in sticklebacks: offspring of brighter males grow slowly but resist parasitic infections. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 7;268(1462):71–76. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boughman J. W. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature. 2001 Jun 21;411(6840):944–948. doi: 10.1038/35082064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Candolin U. The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Anim Behav. 1999 Dec;58(6):1261–1267. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chittka L., Shmida A., Troje N., Menzel R. Ultraviolet as a component of flower reflections, and the colour perception of Hymenoptera. Vision Res. 1994 Jun;34(11):1489–1508. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90151-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cronly-Dillon J., Sharma S. C. Effect of season and sex on the photopic spectral sensitivity of the three-spined stickleback. J Exp Biol. 1968 Dec;49(3):679–687. doi: 10.1242/jeb.49.3.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kokko Hanna, Brooks Robert, Jennions Michael D., Morley Josephine. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):653–664. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rodd F. Helen, Hughes Kimberly A., Grether Gregory F., Baril Colette T. A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 7;269(1490):475–481. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zahavi A. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES