Abstract
Sexual segregation outside the mating season occurs in most species of sexually dimorphic ungulates and has been extensively described in the literature, but the mechanisms causing segregation are still debated. The detailed pattern of sexual segregation throughout the year has rarely been presented for mammals, and no study, to our knowledge, has used latitudinal-related variation in breeding phenology to shed light on the underlying mechanisms. Recent methodological developments have made it possible to quantify separate components of segregation (social, habitat) and activity synchrony in animal groups, but these major improvements have so far been little used. We observed European red deer year round at two widely different latitudes (France and Norway) and tested three different mechanistic hypotheses of segregation related to: (i) predation risk; (ii) body-size-related forage selection; and (iii) activity budget. Habitat segregation peaked during calving in both populations and dropped rapidly after calving. Females with calves were more segregated from males than were females without calves, pointing to a key role of antipredator behaviour even though large predators are absent in France and extremely rare in Norway. However, at both sites individuals also grouped with their own sex within habitat types (i.e. social segregation), and individuals in mixed-sex groups were less synchronized in activity type than individuals in either unisex male or unisex female groups, suggesting that differences in activity budgets are involved. Social segregation peaked during calving and was lowest during the rut (indicating aggregation) in both populations; these activities occurred one month later in the Northern populations, corresponding well with known differences in breeding phenology. We conclude that latitude-dependent breeding phenology shapes the seasonal pattern of sexual segregation and that sexual segregation in ungulates has multiple causes.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (296.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Clutton-Brock T. H. Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989 May 22;236(1285):339–372. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1989.0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conradt L. Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminants? Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Jul 22;265(1403):1359–1363. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conradt L., Roper T. J. Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Nov 7;267(1458):2213–2218. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conradt L. Social segregation is not a consequence of habitat segregation in red deer and feral soay sheep. Anim Behav. 1999 May;57(5):1151–1157. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mysterud A., Yoccoz N. G., Stenseth N. C., Langvatn R. Effects of age, sex and density on body weight of Norwegian red deer: evidence of density-dependent senescence. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 7;268(1470):911–919. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruckstuhl K. E., Neuhaus P. Sexual segregation in ungulates: a comparative test of three hypotheses. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 Feb;77(1):77–96. doi: 10.1017/s1464793101005814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruckstuhl KE. Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep. Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):99–106. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilmshurst J. F., Fryxell J. M., Bergman C. M. The allometry of patch selection in ruminants. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 22;267(1441):345–349. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]