Abstract
This study investigates, for the first time (to our knowledge) for any animal group, the evolution of phylogenetic differences in fibre digestibility across a wide range of feeds that differ in potential fibre digestibility (fibre to lignin ratio) in ruminants. Data, collated from the literature, were analysed using a linear mixed model that allows for different sources of random variability, covariates and fixed effects, as well as controlling for phylogenetic relatedness. This approach overcomes the problem of defining boundaries to separate different ruminant feeding styles (browsers, mixed feeders and grazers) by using two covariates that describe the browser-grazer continuum (proportion of grass and proportion of browse in the natural diet of a species). The results indicate that closely related species are more likely to have similar values of fibre digestibility than species that are more distant in the phylogenetic tree. Body mass did not have any significant effect on fibre digestibility. Fibre digestibility is estimated to increase with the proportion of grass and to decrease with the proportion of browse in the natural diet that characterizes the species. We applied an evolutionary model to infer rates of evolution and ancestral states of fibre digestibility; the model indicates that the rate of evolution of fibre digestibility accelerated across time. We suggest that this could be caused by a combination of increasing competition among ruminant species and adaptation to diets rich in fibre, both related to climatically driven environmental changes in the past few million years.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (145.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cooper S. D., Kyriazakis I., Nolan J. V. Diet selection in sheep: the role of the rumen environment in the selection of a diet from two feeds that differ in their energy density. Br J Nutr. 1995 Jul;74(1):39–54. doi: 10.1079/bjn19950105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garland Jr , T, Ives AR. Using the Past to Predict the Present: Confidence Intervals for Regression Equations in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods. Am Nat. 2000 Mar;155(3):346–364. doi: 10.1086/303327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey P. H., Rambaut A. Comparative analyses for adaptive radiations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Nov 29;355(1403):1599–1605. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janis C. M., Damuth J., Theodor J. M. Miocene ungulates and terrestrial primary productivity: where have all the browsers gone? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jul 5;97(14):7899–7904. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.14.7899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jernvall Jukka, Fortelius Mikael. Common mammals drive the evolutionary increase of hypsodonty in the Neogene. Nature. 2002 May 30;417(6888):538–540. doi: 10.1038/417538a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martins El. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jul;15(7):296–299. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01880-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nolan J. V., Liang J. B., Abdullah N., Kudo H., Ismail H., Ho Y. W., Jalaludin S. Food intake, nutrient utilization and water turnover in the lesser mouse-deer (Tragulus javanicus) given lundai (Sapium baccatum). Comp Biochem Physiol A Physiol. 1995 May;111(1):177–182. doi: 10.1016/0300-9629(95)98535-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pagel M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature. 1999 Oct 28;401(6756):877–884. doi: 10.1038/44766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Barbería F. J., Gordon I. J., Pagel M. The origins of sexual dimorphism in body size in ungulates. Evolution. 2002 Jun;56(6):1276–1285. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez-Barbería F. J., Gordon I. J. Relationships between oral morphology and feeding style in the Ungulata: a phylogenetically controlled evaluation. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 22;268(1471):1023–1032. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rohlf F. J. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution. 2001 Nov 11;55(11):2143–2160. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00731.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.