Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Jun 7;271(1544):1135–1141. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2724

How species respond to multiple extinction threats.

Nick J B Isaac 1, Guy Cowlishaw 1
PMCID: PMC1691707  PMID: 15306363

Abstract

It is well established that different species vary in their vulnerability to extinction risk and that species biology can underpin much of this variation. By contrast, very little is known about how the same species responds to different threat processes. The purpose of this paper is therefore twofold: to examine the extent to which a species' vulnerability to different types of threat might covary and to explore the biological traits that are associated with threat-specific responses. We use an objective and quantitative measure of local extinction risk to show that vulnerability to local population decline in primates varies substantially among species and between threat types. Our results show that a species' response to one threat type does not predict its response to others. Multivariate analyses also suggest that different mechanisms of decline are associated with each type of threat, since different biological traits are correlated with each threat-specific response. Primate species at risk from forestry tend to exhibit low ecological flexibility, while those species vulnerable to agriculture tend to live in the canopy and eat low-fruit diets; in further contrast, primates at risk from hunting tend to exhibit large body size. Our analyses therefore indicate that a species' vulnerability to local extinction can be highly variable and is likely to depend on both threat type and biology.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (108.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Courchamp F, Clutton-Brock T, Grenfell B. Inverse density dependence and the Allee effect. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Oct;14(10):405–410. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01683-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Denney Nicola H., Jennings Simon, Reynolds John D. Life-history correlates of maximum population growth rates in marine fishes. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 7;269(1506):2229–2237. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fisher Diana O., Blomberg Simon P., Owens Ian P. F. Extrinsic versus intrinsic factors in the decline and extinction of Australian marsupials. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1801–1808. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Johnson C. N. Determinants of loss of mammal species during the Late Quaternary 'megafauna' extinctions: life history and ecology, but not body size. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 7;269(1506):2221–2227. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones Kate E., Purvis Andy, Gittleman John L. Biological correlates of extinction risk in bats. Am Nat. 2003 Mar 28;161(4):601–614. doi: 10.1086/368289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kerr Richard A. Paleobiology. Megafauna died from big kill, not big chill. Science. 2003 May 9;300(5621):885–885. doi: 10.1126/science.300.5621.885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pagel M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature. 1999 Oct 28;401(6756):877–884. doi: 10.1038/44766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Purvis A. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 29;348(1326):405–421. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Purvis A., Gittleman J. L., Cowlishaw G., Mace G. M. Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 7;267(1456):1947–1952. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Purvis A., Rambaut A. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Comput Appl Biosci. 1995 Jun;11(3):247–251. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/11.3.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Woodroffe R, Ginsberg JR. Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas . Science. 1998 Jun 26;280(5372):2126–2128. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5372.2126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
15306363s01.pdf (273.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES