Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Jun 22;271(1545):1293–1302. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2720

Habitat fragmentation causes bottlenecks and inbreeding in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea).

Liselotte W Andersen 1, Kåre Fog 1, Christian Damgaard 1
PMCID: PMC1691722  PMID: 15306354

Abstract

A genetic study of the European tree frog, Hyla arborea, in Denmark was undertaken to examine the population structure on mainland Jutland and the island of Lolland after a period of reduction in suitable habitat and population sizes. The two regions have experienced the same rate of habitat loss but fragmentation has been more severe on Lolland. Genetic variation based on 12 polymorphic DNA microsatellites was analysed in 494 tree frogs sampled from two ponds in Jutland and 10 ponds on Lolland. A significant overall deviation from Hardy-Weinberg expectations could be attributed to three ponds, all on Lolland. This was most probably caused by an inbreeding effect reducing fitness, which was supported by the observed significant negative correlation between larva survival and mean F(IS) value and mean individual inbreeding coefficient. A significant reduction in genetic variation (bottleneck) was detected in most of the ponds on Lolland. Population-structure analysis suggested the existence of at least 11 genetically different populations, corresponding to most of the sampled population units. The results indicated that the populations were unique genetic units and could be used to illustrate the migration pattern between newly established ponds arisen either by natural colonization of tree frogs or by artificial introduction. A high degree of pond fidelity in the tree frogs was suggested. A severe fragmentation process reducing population size and fitness within some of the populations probably caused the significant reduction in genetic variation of tree frog populations on Lolland.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (481.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Acevedo-Whitehouse Karina, Gulland Frances, Greig Denise, Amos William. Inbreeding: Disease susceptibility in California sea lions. Nature. 2003 Mar 6;422(6927):35–35. doi: 10.1038/422035a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amos W., Wilmer J. W., Fullard K., Burg T. M., Croxall J. P., Bloch D., Coulson T. The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 7;268(1480):2021–2027. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arens P., Westende W. V., Bugter R., Smulders M. J., Vosman B. Microsatellite markers for the european tree frog Hyla arborea. Mol Ecol. 2000 Nov;9(11):1944–1946. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01095-15.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buchanan F. C., Maiers L. D., Thue T. D., De March B. G., Stewart R. E. Microsatellites from the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus. Mol Ecol. 1998 Aug;7(8):1083–1085. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edenhamn P., Höggren M., Carlson A. Genetic diversity and fitness in peripheral and central populations of the European tree frog Hyla arborea. Hereditas. 2000;133(2):115–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2000.00115.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Garza J. C., Williamson E. G. Detection of reduction in population size using data from microsatellite loci. Mol Ecol. 2001 Feb;10(2):305–318. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01190.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Michalakis Y., Excoffier L. A generic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci. Genetics. 1996 Mar;142(3):1061–1064. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.3.1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Newman R. A., Squire T. Microsatellite variation and fine-scale population structure in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Mol Ecol. 2001 May;10(5):1087–1100. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01255.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pritchard J. K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945–959. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rousset F., Raymond M. Testing heterozygote excess and deficiency. Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1413–1419. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rowe G., Beebee T. J. Fitness and microsatellite diversity estimates were not correlated in two outbred anuran populations. Heredity (Edinb) 2001 Nov;87(Pt 5):558–565. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00944.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ruzzante D. E., Hansen M. M., Meldrup D. Distribution of individual inbreeding coefficients, relatedness and influence of stocking on native anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta) population structure. Mol Ecol. 2001 Sep;10(9):2107–2128. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01352.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Slatkin M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):457–462. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vos C. C., Antonisse-De Jong A. G., Goedhart P. W., Smulders M. J. Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity (Edinb) 2001 May;86(Pt 5):598–608. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00865.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES