Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Jun 22;271(1545):1277–1282. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2735

Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds?

John G Ewen 1, Phillip Cassey 1, Anders P Møller 1
PMCID: PMC1691727  PMID: 15306352

Abstract

The facultative control of primary sex ratio by breeding birds has become a major focus in evolutionary biology in recent years. A combination of well-developed theoretical literature and rapid publication of empirical results has created considerable confusion, with controversial claims for both extreme control of primary sex ratio versus no control around inherent random variability. We present a robust and quantitative summary of published empirical literature to assess clearly the body of evidence for female birds to control sex assignment in their offspring. Our meta-analytical approach reveals that published studies do not exhibit any variability beyond that which could be expected owing to sampling error. Therefore, we conclude that facultative control of offspring sex is not a characteristic biological phenomenon in breeding birds.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (105.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Begg C. B., Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088–1101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Griffiths R., Daan S., Dijkstra C. Sex identification in birds using two CHD genes. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Sep 22;263(1374):1251–1256. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Griffiths R., Double M. C., Orr K., Dawson R. J. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol. 1998 Aug;7(8):1071–1075. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hasselquist Dennis, Kempenaers Bart. Parental care and adaptive brood sex ratio manipulation in birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):363–372. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jennions Michael D., Møller Anders P. Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jan 7;269(1486):43–48. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Komdeur Jan, Magrath Michael J. L., Krackow Sven. Pre-ovulation control of hatchling sex ratio in the Seychelles warbler. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 22;269(1495):1067–1072. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Komdeur Jan, Pen Ido. Adaptive sex allocation in birds: the complexities of linking theory and practice. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):373–380. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sharpe D. Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clin Psychol Rev. 1997 Dec;17(8):881–901. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(97)00056-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. West Stuart A., Sheldon Ben C. Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science. 2002 Jan 31;295(5560):1685–1688. doi: 10.1126/science.1069043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
15306352s01.pdf (110.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES