Abstract
Animals often feed more quickly when in larger groups. This group-size effect is often explained by safety advantages for groups but an alternative explanation is that animals feed faster in larger groups because of greater scramble competition for limited food. We show that predation risk enhances the group-size effect if groups vary in size. By contrast, competition leads to the group-size effect only when individuals feed in groups of constant size. When individuals feed in groups that vary in size, the best strategy for dealing with competition is to feed intensely when in smaller groups and feed little when in larger (more competitive) groups. In all situations, the effects of competition interact with the effects of predation risk in a simple multiplicative way. Our results suggest that scramble competition is not a general explanation for the group-size effect on vigilance in situations where group size changes relatively rapidly.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (123.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beauchamp G., Ruxton G. D. Changes in vigilance with group size under scramble competition. Am Nat. 2003 Feb 28;161(4):672–675. doi: 10.1086/368225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bednekoff Peter A. Testing explanations of the group size effect on vigilance: let's be direct. Behav Processes. 2003 Jul 31;63(3):135–136. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(03)00008-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elgar M. A. Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1989 Feb;64(1):13–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1989.tb00636.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grand TC, Dill LM. The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition? Anim Behav. 1999 Aug;58(2):443–451. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton I. M., Heithaus M. R. The effects of temporal variation in predation risk on anti-predator behaviour: an empirical test using marine snails. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 22;268(1485):2585–2588. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Timberlake W., Peden B. F. On the distinction between open and closed economies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):35–60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Treves A. Theory and method in studies of vigilance and aggregation. Anim Behav. 2000 Dec;60(6):711–722. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]