Abstract
Signals that are perceived over long distances or leave extended spatial traces are subject to eavesdropping. Eavesdropping has therefore acted as a selective pressure in the evolution of diverse animal communication systems, perhaps even in the evolution of functionally referential communication. Early work suggested that some species of stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) may use interceptive olfactory eavesdropping to discover food sources being exploited by competitors, but it is not clear if any stingless bee can be attracted to the odour marks deposited by an interspecific competitor. We show that foragers of the aggressive meliponine bee, Trigona spinipes, can detect and orient towards odour marks deposited by a competitor, Melipona rufiventris, and then rapidly take over the food source, driving away or killing their competitors. When searching for food sources at new locations that they are not already exploiting, T. spinipes foragers strongly prefer M. rufiventris odour marks to odour marks deposited by their own nest-mates, whereas they prefer nest-mate odour marks over M. rufiventris odour marks at a location already occupied by T. spinipes nest-mates. Melipona rufiventris foragers flee from T. spinipes odour marks. This olfactory eavesdropping may have played a role in the evolution of potentially cryptic communication mechanisms such as shortened odour trails, point-source only odour marking and functionally referential communication concealed at the nest.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (200.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dyer Fred C. The biology of the dance language. Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:917–949. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Esch H. E., Zhang S., Srinivasan M. V., Tautz J. Honeybee dances communicate distances measured by optic flow. Nature. 2001 May 31;411(6837):581–583. doi: 10.1038/35079072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Esch H., Esch I., Kerr W. E. Sound: An Element Common to Communication of Stingless Bees and to Dances of the Honey Bee. Science. 1965 Jul 16;149(3681):320–321. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3681.320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nieh James C., Contrera Felipe A. L., Nogueira-Neto Paulo. Pulsed mass recruitment by a stingless bee, Trigona hyalinata. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 22;270(1529):2191–2196. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Peake T. M., Terry A. M. R., McGregor P. K., Dabelsteen T. Do great tits assess rivals by combining direct experience with information gathered by eavesdropping? Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 22;269(1503):1925–1929. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stowe M. K., Turlings T. C., Loughrin J. H., Lewis W. J., Tumlinson J. H. The chemistry of eavesdropping, alarm, and deceit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 3;92(1):23–28. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tautz J., Sandeman D. C. Recruitment of honeybees to non-scented food sources. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2003 Mar 18;189(4):293–300. doi: 10.1007/s00359-003-0402-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitfield John. Nosy neighbours. Nature. 2002 Sep 19;419(6904):242–243. doi: 10.1038/419242a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]