Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Aug 22;271(1549):1685–1691. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2745

Structure of the species--energy relationship.

Aletta Bonn 1, David Storch 1, Kevin J Gaston 1
PMCID: PMC1691779  PMID: 15306288

Abstract

The relationship between energy availability and species richness (the species-energy relationship) is one of the best documented macroecological phenomena. However, the structure of species distribution along the gradient, the proximate driver of the relationship, is poorly known. Here, using data on the distribution of birds in southern Africa, for which species richness increases linearly with energy availability, we provide an explicit determination of this structure. We show that most species exhibit increasing occupancy towards more productive regions (occurring in more grid cells within a productivity class). However, average reporting rates per species within occupied grid cells, a correlate of local density, do not show a similar increase. The mean range of used energy levels and the mean geographical range size of species in southern Africa decreases along the energy gradient, as most species are present at high productivity levels but only some can extend their ranges towards lower levels. Species turnover among grid cells consequently decreases towards high energy levels. In summary, these patterns support the hypothesis that higher productivity leads to more species by increasing the probability of occurrence of resources that enable the persistence of viable populations, without necessarily affecting local population densities.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (316.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allen Andrew P., Brown James H., Gillooly James F. Global biodiversity, biochemical kinetics, and the energetic-equivalence rule. Science. 2002 Aug 30;297(5586):1545–1548. doi: 10.1126/science.1072380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Balmford A., Moore J. L., Brooks T., Burgess N., Hansen L. A., Williams P., Rahbek C. Conservation conflicts across Africa. Science. 2001 Mar 30;291(5513):2616–2619. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5513.2616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chase Jonathan M., Leibold Mathew A. Spatial scale dictates the productivity-biodiversity relationship. Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):427–430. doi: 10.1038/416427a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gaston K. J. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):220–227. doi: 10.1038/35012228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hurlbert Allen H., Haskell John P. The effect of energy and seasonality on avian species richness and community composition. Am Nat. 2002 Dec 30;161(1):83–97. doi: 10.1086/345459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaspari M, O'Donnell S, Kercher JR. Energy, Density, and Constraints to Species Richness: Ant Assemblages along a Productivity Gradient. Am Nat. 2000 Feb;155(2):280–293. doi: 10.1086/303313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaspari Michael, Yuan May, Alonso Leeanne. Spatial grain and the causes of regional diversity gradients in ants. Am Nat. 2003 Mar;161(3):459–477. doi: 10.1086/367906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES