Abstract
The question of why territorial residents usually win asymmetrical owner-intruder contests is critical to our understanding of animal contest evolution. Game theory suggests that, under certain conditions, residency could be used as an arbitrary means of contest settlement in a manner analogous to tossing a coin. Key empirical support for this idea is provided by a study on the speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria); however, this result has proven controversial. We show conclusively that residency does not serve as an arbitrary cue for contest settlement in this species. By means of a series of manipulative experiments, conducted on two phenotypically divergent populations of P. aegeria, we also rule out the recently presented alternative that contests are settled due to resource-correlated asymmetries in thoracic temperature. Our results instead suggest that more intrinsically aggressive males accumulate as residents and continue to win due to the self-reinforcing effect of prior winning experience. Truly arbitrary contest settlement may be rare or non-existent in the wild.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (99.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Gilbert S. J., Wotton P. R., Tarlton J. F., Duance V. C., Bailey A. J. Increased expression of promatrix metalloproteinase-9 and neutrophil elastase in canine dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 1997 May;34(2):377–383. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(97)00011-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hardy ICW, Field SA. Logistic analysis of animal contests. Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):787–792. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stutt AD, Willmer P. Territorial defence in speckled wood butterflies: do the hottest males always win? Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1341–1347. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]