Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Aug 22;271(1549):1737–1743. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2783

Endosperm triploidy has a selective advantage during ongoing parental conflict by imprinting.

J A Stewart-Cox 1, N F Britton 1, M Mogie 1
PMCID: PMC1691787  PMID: 15306295

Abstract

The endosperm of the flowering plant mediates the supply of maternal resources for embryogenesis. An endosperm formed in sexual reproduction between diploid parents is typically triploid, with a 2 : 1 ratio of maternal genetic material (denoted as 2m : 1p). Variation from this ratio affects endosperm size, indicating parent-specific expression of genes involved in endosperm growth and development. The presence of paternally or maternally imprinted genes can be explained by parental conflict over the transfer of nutrients from maternal to offspring tissue. Genomic imprinting can, for example, provide the male parent of an embryo in a mixed-paternity seed pod, with an opportunity for expressing its preference for a disproportionate allocation of resources to its embryo. It has been argued that a diploid 1m : 1p endosperm was ancestral and the 2m : 1p endosperm evolved after parental conflict, to improve maternal control over seed provisioning. We present a population genetic model, which instead places the origin of triploidy early in the parental conflict over resource allocation. We find that there is an advantage to having a triploid endosperm as the parental conflict continues. This advantage can help to explain why the 2m : 1p endosperm prevails among flowering plants.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (119.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams S., Vinkenoog R., Spielman M., Dickinson H. G., Scott R. J. Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana require DNA methylation. Development. 2000 Jun;127(11):2493–2502. doi: 10.1242/dev.127.11.2493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow D. P. Methylation and imprinting: from host defense to gene regulation? Science. 1993 Apr 16;260(5106):309–310. doi: 10.1126/science.8469984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charnov E. L. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 May;76(5):2480–2484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.5.2480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Haig D. Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Nov 22;264(1388):1657–1662. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liang M., Ekblad E., Gustafsson J. A., Nilsson B. O. Stimulation of vascular protein synthesis by activation of oestrogen receptor beta. J Endocrinol. 2001 Dec;171(3):417–423. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1710417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Parker G. A., MacNair M. R. Models of parent-offspring conflict. I. Monogamy. Anim Behav. 1978 Feb;26(1):97–110. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(78)90009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Scott R. J., Spielman M., Bailey J., Dickinson H. G. Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development. 1998 Sep;125(17):3329–3341. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.17.3329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Spencer H. G., Williams M. J. The evolution of genomic imprinting: two modifier-locus models. Theor Popul Biol. 1997 Feb;51(1):23–35. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vinkenoog R., Spielman M., Adams S., Dickinson H. G., Scott R. J. Genomic imprinting in plants. Methods Mol Biol. 2001;181:327–370. doi: 10.1385/1592592112:327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilkins J. F., Haig D. Genomic imprinting of two antagonistic loci. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 22;268(1479):1861–1867. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Williams Joseph H., Friedman William E. Identification of diploid endosperm in an early angiosperm lineage. Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):522–526. doi: 10.1038/415522a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
15306295s01.pdf (213.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES