Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Sep 7;271(1550):1771–1776. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2798

Multiple origins of parasitism in lice.

Kevin P Johnson 1, Kazunori Yoshizawa 1, Vincent S Smith 1
PMCID: PMC1691793  PMID: 15315891

Abstract

A major fraction of the diversity of insects is parasitic, as herbivores, parasitoids or vertebrate ectopara sites. Understanding this diversity requires information on the origin of parasitism in various insect groups. Parasitic lice (Phthiraptera) are the only major group of insects in which all members are permanent parasites of birds or mammals. Lice are classified into a single order but are thought to be closely related to, or derived from, book lice and bark lice (Psocoptera). Here, we use sequences of the nuclear 18S rDNA gene to investigate the relationships among Phthiraptera and Psocoptera and to identify the origins of parasitism in this group (termed Psocodea). Maximum-likelihood (ML), Bayesian ML and parsimony analyses of these data indicate that lice are embedded within the psocopteran infraorder Nanopsocetae, making the order Psocoptera paraphyletic (i.e. does not contain all descendants of a single common ancestor). Furthermore, one family of Psocoptera, Liposcelididae, is identified as the sister taxon to the louse suborder Amblycera, making parasitic lice (Phthiraptera) a polyphyletic order (i.e. descended from two separate ancestors). We infer from these results that parasitism of vertebrates arose twice independently within Psocodea, once in the common ancestor of Amblycera and once in the common ancestor of all other parasitic lice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (169.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Farrell BD. "Inordinate Fondness" explained: why are there So many beetles? . Science. 1998 Jul 24;281(5376):555–559. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5376.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goldman N., Anderson J. P., Rodrigo A. G. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst Biol. 2000 Dec;49(4):652–670. doi: 10.1080/106351500750049752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hafner M. S., Sudman P. D., Villablanca F. X., Spradling T. A., Demastes J. W., Nadler S. A. Disparate rates of molecular evolution in cospeciating hosts and parasites. Science. 1994 Aug 19;265(5175):1087–1090. doi: 10.1126/science.8066445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huelsenbeck J. P., Rannala B., Larget B. A Bayesian framework for the analysis of cospeciation. Evolution. 2000 Apr;54(2):352–364. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00039.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Huelsenbeck J. P., Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754–755. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Huelsenbeck John P., Larget Bret, Miller Richard E., Ronquist Fredrik. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst Biol. 2002 Oct;51(5):673–688. doi: 10.1080/10635150290102366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson K. P., Adams R. J., Clayton D. H. Molecular systematics of Goniodidae (Insecta: Phthiraptera). J Parasitol. 2001 Aug;87(4):862–869. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2001)087[0862:MSOGIP]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Johnson Kevin P., Cruickshank Robert H., Adams Richard J., Smith Vincent S., Page Roderic D. M., Clayton Dale H. Dramatically elevated rate of mitochondrial substitution in lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Feb;26(2):231–242. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00342-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson Kevin P., Whiting Michael F. Multiple genes and the monophyly of Ischnocera (Insecta: Phthiraptera). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Jan;22(1):101–110. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kishino H., Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. J Mol Evol. 1989 Aug;29(2):170–179. doi: 10.1007/BF02100115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Page R. D. M., Cruickshank R., Johnson K. P. Louse (Insecta: Phthiraptera) mitochondrial 12S rRNA secondary structure is highly variable. Insect Mol Biol. 2002 Aug;11(4):361–369. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2002.00346.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Posada D., Crandall K. A. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817–818. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Proctor H, Owens I., I Mites and birds: diversity, parasitism and coevolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Sep;15(9):358–364. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01924-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rambaut A., Grassly N. C. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Jun;13(3):235–238. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/13.3.235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Shimodaira H., Hasegawa M. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1246–1247. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shimodaira Hidetoshi. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst Biol. 2002 Jun;51(3):492–508. doi: 10.1080/10635150290069913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D. G. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Whitfield J. B. Phylogeny and evolution of host-parasitoid interactions in hymenoptera. Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:129–151. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Whiting M. F., Carpenter J. C., Wheeler Q. D., Wheeler W. C. The Strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Syst Biol. 1997 Mar;46(1):1–68. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/46.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Whiting Michael F., Bradler Sven, Maxwell Taylor. Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects. Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):264–267. doi: 10.1038/nature01313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wuyts J., De Rijk P., Van de Peer Y., Pison G., Rousseeuw P., De Wachter R. Comparative analysis of more than 3000 sequences reveals the existence of two pseudoknots in area V4 of eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Dec 1;28(23):4698–4708. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.23.4698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yoshizawa Kazunori, Johnson Kevin P. Phylogenetic position of Phthiraptera (Insecta: Paraneoptera) and elevated rate of evolution in mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Oct;29(1):102–114. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00073-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
15315891s01.pdf (106.2KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES