Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Sep 22;271(1551):1917–1922. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2581

Evolution of spite through indirect reciprocity.

Rufus A Johnstone 1, Redouan Bshary 1
PMCID: PMC1691811  PMID: 15347514

Abstract

How can cooperation persist in the face of a temptation to 'cheat'? Several recent papers have suggested that the answer may lie in indirect reciprocity. Altruistic individuals may benefit by eliciting altruism from observers, rather than (as in direct reciprocity) from the recipient of the aid they provide. Here, we point out that indirect reciprocity need not always favour cooperation; by contrast, it may support spiteful behaviour, which is costly for the both actor and recipient. Existing theory suggests spite is unlikely to persist, but we demonstrate that it may do so when spiteful individuals are less likely to incur aggression from observers (a negative form of indirect reciprocity).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (133.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bshary Redouan. Biting cleaner fish use altruism to deceive image-scoring client reef fish. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 22;269(1505):2087–2093. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Earley Ryan L., Dugatkin Lee Alan. Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):943–952. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fehr Ernst, Gächter Simon. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137–140. doi: 10.1038/415137a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamilton W. D. Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature. 1970 Dec 19;228(5277):1218–1220. doi: 10.1038/2281218a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnstone R. A. Eavesdropping and animal conflict. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(16):9177–9180. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161058798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Leimar O., Hammerstein P. Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 7;268(1468):745–753. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lotem A., Fishman M. A., Stone L. Evolution of cooperation between individuals. Nature. 1999 Jul 15;400(6741):226–227. doi: 10.1038/22247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lotem Arnon, Fishman Michael A., Stone Lewi. From reciprocity to unconditional altruism through signalling benefits. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jan 22;270(1511):199–205. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Naguib M, Todt D. Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales. Anim Behav. 1997 Dec;54(6):1535–1543. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.9997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nowak M. A., Sigmund K. Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature. 1998 Jun 11;393(6685):573–577. doi: 10.1038/31225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nowak M. A., Sigmund K. The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J Theor Biol. 1998 Oct 21;194(4):561–574. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  13. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peake T. M., Terry A. M., McGregor P. K., Dabelsteen T. Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 7;268(1472):1183–1187. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wedekind C., Milinski M. Cooperation through image scoring in humans. Science. 2000 May 5;288(5467):850–852. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5467.850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zahavi A. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES