Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Nov 7;271(1554):2297–2304. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2835

Learning fine-tunes a specific response of nestlings to the parental alarm calls of their own species.

N B Davies 1, J R Madden 1, S H M Butchart 1
PMCID: PMC1691854  PMID: 15539356

Abstract

Parent birds often give alarm calls when a predator approaches their nest. However, it is not clear whether these alarms function to warn nestlings, nor is it known whether nestling responses are species-specific. The parental alarms of reed warblers, Acrocephalus scirpaceus ("churr"), dunnocks, Prunella modularis ("tseep"), and robins, Erithacus rubecula ("seee") are very different. Playback experiments revealed that nestlings of all three species ceased begging only in response to conspecific alarm calls. These differences between species in response are not simply a product of differences in raising environment, because when newly hatched dunnocks and robins were cross-fostered to nests of the other two species, they did not develop a response to their foster species' alarms. Instead, they still responded specifically to their own species' alarms. However, their response was less strong than that of nestlings raised normally by their own species. We suggest that, as in song development, a neural template enables nestlings to recognize features of their own species' signals from a background of irrelevant sounds, but learning then fine-tunes the response to reduce recognition errors.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (185.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kilner R, Davies NB. Nestling mouth colour: ecological correlates of a begging signal. Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):705–712. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kilner RM, Davies NB. How selfish is a cuckoo chick? Anim Behav. 1999 Oct;58(4):797–808. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Marler P. Three models of song learning: evidence from behavior. J Neurobiol. 1997 Nov;33(5):501–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Platzen Dirk, Magrath Robert D. Parental alarm calls suppress nestling vocalization. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jun 22;271(1545):1271–1276. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rainey Hugo J., Zuberbühler Klaus, Slater Peter J. B. Hornbills can distinguish between primate alarm calls. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 7;271(1540):755–759. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Soha JA, Marler P. A species-specific acoustic cue for selective song learning in the white-crowned sparrow. Anim Behav. 2000 Sep;60(3):297–306. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Streeter L. A. Language perception of 2-month-old infants shows effects of both innate mechanisms and experience. Nature. 1976 Jan 1;259(5538):39–41. doi: 10.1038/259039a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES