Abstract
Both sexual selection and natural selection can influence the form of dimorphism in secondary sexual traits. Here, we used a comparative approach to examine the relative roles of sexual selection and natural selection in the evolution of sexually dimorphic coloration (dichromatism) and ornamentation in agamid lizards. Sexual dimorphism in head and body size were used as indirect indicators of sexual selection, and habitat type (openness) as an index of natural selection. We examined separately the dichromatism of body regions "exposed to" and "concealed from" visual predators, because these body regions are likely to be subject to different selection pressures. Dichromatism of "exposed" body regions was significantly associated with habitat type: males were typically more conspicuously coloured than females in closed habitats. By contrast, dichromatism of "concealed" body regions and ornament dimorphism were positively associated with sexual size dimorphism (SSD). When we examined male and female ornamentation separately, however, both were positively associated with habitat openness in addition to snout-vent length and head SSD. These results suggest that natural selection constrains the evolution of elaborate ornamentation in both sexes as well as sexual dichromatism of body regions exposed to visual predators. By contrast, dichromatism of "concealed" body regions and degree of ornament dimorphism appear to be driven to a greater degree by sexual selection.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (139.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Ackerly D. D. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts. Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1480–1492. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00694.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Butler M. A., Schoener T. W., Losos J. B. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):259–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cox Robert M., Skelly Stephanie L., John-Alder Henry B. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution. 2003 Jul;57(7):1653–1669. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00371.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dunn P. O., Whittingham L. A., Pitcher T. E. Mating systems, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution. 2001 Jan;55(1):161–175. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hews D. K., Moore M. C. Influence of androgens on differentiation of secondary sex characters in tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1995 Jan;97(1):86–102. doi: 10.1006/gcen.1995.1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R., Kirkpatrick M. Ecological speciation by sexual selection. J Theor Biol. 1988 Jul 8;133(1):85–98. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80026-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Macey J. R., Schulte J. A., 2nd, Larson A., Ananjeva N. B., Wang Y., Pethiyagoda R., Rastegar-Pouyani N., Papenfuss T. J. Evaluating trans-tethys migration: an example using acrodont lizard phylogenetics. Syst Biol. 2000 Jun;49(2):233–256. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/49.2.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morrow Edward H., Pitcher Trevor E. Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in birds. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1793–1799. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ord T. J., Blumstein D. T., Evans C. S. Intrasexual selection predicts the evolution of signal complexity in lizards. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 7;268(1468):737–744. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Pang Junfeng, Wang Yuezhao, Zhong Yang, Hoelzel A. Rus, Papenfuss Theodore J., Zeng Xiaomao, Ananjeva Natalia B., Zhang Ya-ping. A phylogeny of Chinese species in the genus Phrynocephalus (Agamidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Jun;27(3):398–409. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(03)00019-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Purvis A., Gittleman J. L., Cowlishaw G., Mace G. M. Predicting extinction risk in declining species. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 7;267(1456):1947–1952. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulte James A., 2nd, Macey J. Robert, Pethiyagoda Rohan, Larson Allan. Rostral horn evolution among agamid lizards of the genus Ceratophora endemic to Sri Lanka. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Jan;22(1):111–117. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schulte James A., 2nd, Melville Jane, Larson Allan. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for ancient divergence of lizard taxa on either side of Wallace's Line. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):597–603. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shine R. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Q Rev Biol. 1989 Dec;64(4):419–461. doi: 10.1086/416458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sinervo B., Miles D. B., Frankino W. A., Klukowski M., DeNardo D. F. Testosterone, endurance, and Darwinian fitness: natural and sexual selection on the physiological bases of alternative male behaviors in side-blotched lizards. Horm Behav. 2000 Dec;38(4):222–233. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2000.1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stuart-Fox Devi, Owens Ian P. F. Species richness in agamid lizards: chance, body size, sexual selection or ecology? J Evol Biol. 2003 Jul;16(4):659–669. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.