Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Nov 22;271(1555):2403–2410. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2857

Partnership status and the human sex ratio at birth.

Karen Norberg 1
PMCID: PMC1691865  PMID: 15556894

Abstract

If two-parent care has different consequences for the reproductive success of sons and daughters, then natural selection may favour adjustment of the sex ratio at birth according to circumstances that forecast later family structure. In humans, this partnership-status hypothesis predicts fewer sons among extra-pair conceptions, but the rival 'attractiveness' hypothesis predicts more sons among extra-pair conceptions, and the 'fixed-phenotype' hypothesis predicts a constant probability of having a son, regardless of partnership status. In a sample of 86 436 human births pooled from five US population-based surveys, I found 51.5% male births reported by respondents who were living with a spouse or partner before the child's conception or birth, and 49.9% male births reported by respondents who were not (chi(2)=16.77 d.f.=1 p<0.0001). The effect was not explained by paternal bias against daughters, by parental age, education, income, ethnicity or by year of observation, and was larger when comparisons were made between siblings. To my knowledge, this is the first direct evidence for conditional adjustment of the sex ratio at birth in humans, and could explain the recent decline in the sex ratio at birth in some developed countries.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (111.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albrecht Daniel J., Johnson L. Scott. Manipulation of offspring sex ratio by second-mated female house wrens. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 7;269(1490):461–465. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blettner M., Sauerbrei W., Schlehofer B., Scheuchenpflug T., Friedenreich C. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;28(1):1–9. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burley N. Sex ratio manipulation and selection for attractiveness. Science. 1981 Feb 13;211(4483):721–722. doi: 10.1126/science.211.4483.721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark A. B. Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science. 1978 Jul 14;201(4351):163–165. doi: 10.1126/science.201.4351.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clutton-Brock T. H. Sons and daughters. Nature. 1982 Jul 1;298(5869):11–13. doi: 10.1038/298011a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haig D. Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Nov 22;264(1388):1657–1662. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamilton W. D. Extraordinary sex ratios. A sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology. Science. 1967 Apr 28;156(3774):477–488. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3774.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hasselquist Dennis, Kempenaers Bart. Parental care and adaptive brood sex ratio manipulation in birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):363–372. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. James W. H. The human sex ratio. Part 1: A review of the literature. Hum Biol. 1987 Oct;59(5):721–752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Klonoff-Cohen H. S., Savitz D. A., Cefalo R. C., McCann M. F. An epidemiologic study of contraception and preeclampsia. JAMA. 1989 Dec 8;262(22):3143–3147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Krackow S. Potential mechanisms for sex ratio adjustment in mammals and birds. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1995 May;70(2):225–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1995.tb01066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Larsen Clark Spencer. Equality for the sexes in human evolution? Early hominid sexual dimorphism and implications for mating systems and social behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 28;100(16):9103–9104. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1633678100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lundberg Shelly, Rose Elaina. Child gender and the transition to marriage. Demography. 2003 May;40(2):333–349. doi: 10.1353/dem.2003.0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marcus M., Kiely J., Xu F., McGeehin M., Jackson R., Sinks T. Changing sex ratio in the United States, 1969-1995. Fertil Steril. 1998 Aug;70(2):270–273. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00149-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marlowe F. Paternal investment and the human mating system. Behav Processes. 2000 Oct 5;51(1-3):45–61. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00118-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Robillard P. Y., Hulsey T. C., Périanin J., Janky E., Miri E. H., Papiernik E. Association of pregnancy-induced hypertension with duration of sexual cohabitation before conception. Lancet. 1994 Oct 8;344(8928):973–975. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91638-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Seielstad M. T., Minch E., Cavalli-Sforza L. L. Genetic evidence for a higher female migration rate in humans. Nat Genet. 1998 Nov;20(3):278–280. doi: 10.1038/3088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shiono P. H., Harlap S., Ramcharan S. Sex of offspring of women using oral contraceptives, rhythm, and other methods of birth control around the time of conception. Fertil Steril. 1982 Mar;37(3):367–372. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46097-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Trivers R. L., Willard D. E. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90–92. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wedekind C., Seebeck T., Bettens F., Paepke A. J. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 22;260(1359):245–249. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES