Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Dec 7;271(1556):2501–2508. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2891

Performance capacity, fighting tactics and the evolution of life-stage male morphs in the green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis).

Simon P Lailvaux 1, Anthony Herrel 1, Bieke Vanhooydonck 1, Jay J Meyers 1, Duncan J Irschick 1
PMCID: PMC1691885  PMID: 15590602

Abstract

The evolution of alternative male phenotypes is probably driven by male-male competition for access to reproductive females, but few studies have examined whether whole-organism performance capacities differ between male morphs, and if so whether any such differences affect fighting ability. We show how ontogenetic changes in performance and morphology have given rise to two distinct life-stage male morphs exhibiting different fighting tactics within the green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis). Field studies show a bimodal distribution of adult males within a single population: larger 'heavyweight' males have relatively large heads and high bite forces for their size, whereas smaller 'lightweight' males have smaller heads and lower bite forces. In staged fights between size-matched heavyweight males, males with greater biting ability won more frequently, whereas in lightweight fights, males with greater jumping velocity and acceleration won more often. Because growth in reptiles is indeterminate, and the anole males examined are sexually mature, we propose that the heavyweight morph arose through selection against males with small heads and poor bite forces at the lightweight-heavyweight size transition. Our findings imply that one may not be able to predict male fighting success (and hence potential mating success) by examining aspects of male 'quality' at only one life stage.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (248.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brandt Y. Lizard threat display handicaps endurance. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 May 22;270(1519):1061–1068. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Herrel A., De Grauw E., Lemos-Espinal J. A. Head shape and bite performance in xenosaurid lizards. J Exp Zool. 2001 Jul 1;290(2):101–107. doi: 10.1002/jez.1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Huey Raymond B., Hertz Paul E., Sinervo B. Behavioral drive versus behavioral inertia in evolution: a null model approach. Am Nat. 2003 Mar;161(3):357–366. doi: 10.1086/346135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hunt J., Simmons L. W. Status-dependent selection in the dimorphic beetle Onthophagus taurus. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Dec 7;268(1484):2409–2414. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kokko Hanna, Brooks Robert, Jennions Michael D., Morley Josephine. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 22;270(1515):653–664. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Leal M. Honest signalling during prey-predator interactions in the lizard Anolis cristatellus. Anim Behav. 1999 Sep;58(3):521–526. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leal M, Rodríguez-robles JA. Signalling displays during predator-prey interactions in a Puerto Rican anole, Anolis cristatellus. Anim Behav. 1997 Nov;54(5):1147–1154. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Moore M. C. Application of organization-activation theory to alternative male reproductive strategies: a review. Horm Behav. 1991 Jun;25(2):154–179. doi: 10.1016/0018-506x(91)90048-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sinervo B., Miles D. B., Frankino W. A., Klukowski M., DeNardo D. F. Testosterone, endurance, and Darwinian fitness: natural and sexual selection on the physiological bases of alternative male behaviors in side-blotched lizards. Horm Behav. 2000 Dec;38(4):222–233. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2000.1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stamps JA, Krishnan VV. Territory acquisition in lizards. IV. Obtaining high status and exclusive home ranges. Anim Behav. 1998 Feb;55(2):461–472. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Toro Esteban, Herrel Anthony, Vanhooydonck Bieke, Irschick Duncan J. A biomechanical analysis of intra- and interspecific scaling of jumping and morphology in Caribbean Anolis lizards. J Exp Biol. 2003 Aug;206(Pt 15):2641–2652. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES