Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Dec 22;271(1557):2583–2585. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2941

Genetic and environmental contributions to pro-social attitudes: a twin study of social responsibility.

J Philippe Rushton 1
PMCID: PMC1691905  PMID: 15615684

Abstract

Although 51 twin and adoption studies have been performed on the genetic architecture of antisocial behaviour, only four previous studies have examined a genetic contribution to pro-social behaviour. Earlier work by the author with the University of London Institute of Psychiatry Adult Twin Register found that genes contributed approximately half of the variance to measures of self-report altruism, empathy, nurturance and aggression, including acts of violence. The present study extends those results by using a 22-item Social Responsibility Questionnaire with 174 pairs of monozygotic twins and 148 pairs of dizygotic twins. Forty-two per cent of the reliable variance was due to the twins' genes, 23% to the twins' common environment and the remainder to the twins' non-shared environment.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (77.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERKOWITZ L., DANIELS L. R. AFFECTING THE SALIENCE OF THE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY NORM: EFFECTS OF PAST HELP ON THE RESPONSE TO DEPENDENCY RELATIONSHIPS. J Abnorm Psychol. 1964 Mar;68:275–281. doi: 10.1037/h0040164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouchard T. J., Jr, Loehlin J. C. Genes, evolution, and personality. Behav Genet. 2001 May;31(3):243–273. doi: 10.1023/a:1012294324713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harris J. R. The outcome of parenting: what do we really know? J Pers. 2000 Jun;68(3):625–649. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Krueger R. F., Hicks B. M., McGue M. Altruism and antisocial behavior: independent tendencies, unique personality correlates, distinct etiologies. Psychol Sci. 2001 Sep;12(5):397–402. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lykken D. T., Tellegen A., DeRubeis R. Volunteer bias in twin research: the rule of two-thirds. Soc Biol. 1978 Spring;25(1):1–9. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1978.9988312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mednick S. A., Gabrielli W. F., Jr, Hutchings B. Genetic influences in criminal convictions: evidence from an adoption cohort. Science. 1984 May 25;224(4651):891–894. doi: 10.1126/science.6719119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rhee Soo Hyun, Waldman Irwin D. Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: a meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychol Bull. 2002 May;128(3):490–529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rushton J. P., Fulker D. W., Neale M. C., Nias D. K., Eysenck H. J. Altruism and aggression: the heritability of individual differences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Jun;50(6):1192–1198. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.50.6.1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rushton J. P. Self-report delinquency and violence in adult twins. Psychiatr Genet. 1996 Summer;6(2):87–89. doi: 10.1097/00041444-199622000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES