Skip to main content
PMC home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 May 29;352(1353):551–571. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0038

Functional design of tentacles in squid: linking sarcomere ultrastructure to gross morphological dynamics

J L van Leeuwen, W M Kier
PMCID: PMC1691950

Abstract

This paper offers a quantitative analysis of tentacle extension in squid that integrates several levels of structural organization. The muscular stalks of the two tentacles of squid are rapidly elongated by 70 per cent of resting length during prey capture. A typical duration of the extension is 30 ms in Loligo pealei (with a contracted tentacle length of 93 mm and a strike distance of about 37 mm). In a successful strike, the terminal clubs hit the prey and attach to it via arrays of suckers.

A forward dynamics model is proposed for the extension of the tentacular stalk and the forward motion of the terminal club. The stalk is modelled as a longitudinal array of thin muscular discs with extensor muscle fibres oriented parallel to the disc planes. As a disc contracts radially, it lengthens because its volume is constant. The equations of motion for the linked system of discs were formulated and solved numerically. The inputs of the model are the dimensions of the tentacle, passive and active muscle properties such as Hill's force–velocity relationship, myofilament lengths and activation of the muscle fibres. The model predicts the changing geometry of the tentacle, the pressure and stress distribution inside the tentacle and the velocity and kinetic energy distribution of the stalk and club. These predictions are in agreement with kinematic observations from high-speed films of prey capture. The model demonstrates also that the unusually short myosin filaments (reported range 0.5–0.9 micrometre) that characterize the extensor muscles are necessary for the observed extension performance. Myosin filament lengths typical for vertebrate sarcomeres (1.58 micrometre) would lead to a significant reduction in performance. In addition, the model predicts that, to maximize peak velocity of the terminal club, the myosin filaments should be longer at the base and shorter at the tip of the stalk (0.97 micrometre at the base and 0.50 micrometre at the tip for the tentacle size above). This results from differences in dynamic loading along the stalk. Finally, the model allows exploration of the effects of changes in the dimensions and mass of the tentacle and intrinsic speed of the myofilaments on the optimum myosin filament lengths.

Keywords: Tentacle Extension Squid

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (635.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABBOTT B. C., BASKIN R. J. Volume changes in frog muscle during contraction. J Physiol. 1962 May;161:379–391. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gans C., Gorniak G. C. How does the toad flip its tongue? Test of two hypotheses. Science. 1982 Jun 18;216(4552):1335–1337. doi: 10.1126/science.216.4552.1335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gordon A. M., Huxley A. F., Julian F. J. The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HUXLEY A. F., NIEDERGERKE R. Structural changes in muscle during contraction; interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature. 1954 May 22;173(4412):971–973. doi: 10.1038/173971a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Josephson R. K. Extensive and intensive factors determining the performance of striated muscle. J Exp Zool. 1975 Oct;194(1):135–153. doi: 10.1002/jez.1401940109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kier W. M., Schachat F. H. Biochemical comparison of fast- and slow-contracting squid muscle. J Exp Biol. 1992 Jul;168:41–56. doi: 10.1242/jeb.168.1.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kier W, Leeuwen J. A kinematic analysis of tentacle extension in the squid Loligo pealei. J Exp Biol. 1997;200(Pt 1):41–53. doi: 10.1242/jeb.200.1.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lombard R. E., Wake D. B. Tongue evolution in the lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae. II. Function and evolutionary diversity. J Morphol. 1977 Jul;153(1):39–79. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051530104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Messenger J. B. The visual attack of the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Anim Behav. 1968 Apr-Jul;16(2):342–357. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(68)90020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Otten E. A myocybernetic model of the jaw system of the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1987 Oct;21(2-4):287–302. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(87)90123-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  12. Van Leeuwen J. L., Spoor C. W. Modelling mechanically stable muscle architectures. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 May 29;336(1277):275–292. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Leeuwen J. L., Spoor C. W. Modelling the pressure and force equilibrium in unipennate muscles with in-line tendons. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993 Dec 29;342(1302):321–333. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1993.0162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. van Leeuwen J. L. Optimum power output and structural design of sarcomeres. J Theor Biol. 1991 Mar 21;149(2):229–256. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80279-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. van Leeuwen J. L. The action of muscles in swimming fish. Exp Physiol. 1995 Mar;80(2):177–191. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1995.sp003838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES