Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 Aug 29;352(1358):1275–1282. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0110

Top-down processes in object identification: evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology and functional anatomy.

G W Humphreys 1, M J Riddoch 1, C J Price 1
PMCID: PMC1692003  PMID: 9304694

Abstract

Many models of object identification are bottom-up and serial in nature; processing at a first stage needs to be complete before it is passed on to a subsequent stage, and there is no top-down feedback from the later to the earlier stages. However, data on picture identification in normal observers contradict a strict serial account of processing, since effects of variables on early and late stages of object identification combine in an interactive rather than an additive manner. Recent neuropsychological and functional anatomical data also indicate that object identification involves top-down activation of earlier stages of visual processing. In neuropsychological patients, subtle perceptual deficits can produce naming problems, even when there is good access to associated semantic knowledge; in functional activation studies, there is increased activity in visual processing areas when conditions require object naming relative to object recognition. These studies provide evidence that increased visual processing occurs in identification tasks, suggesting that there is re-current feedback during the identification process.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (171.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caramazza A., Hillis A. E. Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain. Nature. 1991 Feb 28;349(6312):788–790. doi: 10.1038/349788a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caramazza A., Hillis A. E. Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex. 1990 Mar;26(1):95–122. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coslett H. B., Saffran E. M. Preserved object recognition and reading comprehension in optic aphasia. Brain. 1989 Aug;112(Pt 4):1091–1110. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.4.1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Damasio H., Grabowski T. J., Tranel D., Hichwa R. D., Damasio A. R. A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):499–505. doi: 10.1038/380499a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Farah M. J., McClelland J. L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991 Dec;120(4):339–357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Farah M. J., Wallace M. A. Semantically-bounded anomia: implications for the neural implementation of naming. Neuropsychologia. 1992 Jul;30(7):609–621. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90066-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frackowiak R. S. Functional mapping of verbal memory and language. Trends Neurosci. 1994 Mar;17(3):109–115. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(94)90119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Geschwind N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. II. Brain. 1965 Sep;88(3):585–644. doi: 10.1093/brain/88.3.585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hart J., Jr, Berndt R. S., Caramazza A. Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction. Nature. 1985 Aug 1;316(6027):439–440. doi: 10.1038/316439a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Humphreys G. W., Lamote C., Lloyd-Jones T. J. An interactive activation approach to object processing: effects of structural similarity, name frequency, and task in normality and pathology. Memory. 1995 Sep-Dec;3(3-4):535–586. doi: 10.1080/09658219508253164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Humphreys G. W., Riddoch M. J. Object agnosias. Baillieres Clin Neurol. 1993 Aug;2(2):339–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kay J., Ellis A. A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia. Implications for psychological models of word retrieval. Brain. 1987 Jun;110(Pt 3):613–629. doi: 10.1093/brain/110.3.613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lloyd-Jones T. J., Humphreys G. W. Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: evidence from naming and object decision. Mem Cognit. 1997 Jan;25(1):18–35. doi: 10.3758/bf03197282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin A., Wiggs C. L., Ungerleider L. G., Haxby J. V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature. 1996 Feb 15;379(6566):649–652. doi: 10.1038/379649a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Morrison C. M., Ellis A. W., Quinlan P. T. Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition. Mem Cognit. 1992 Nov;20(6):705–714. doi: 10.3758/bf03202720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Perani D., Cappa S. F., Bettinardi V., Bressi S., Gorno-Tempini M., Matarrese M., Fazio F. Different neural systems for the recognition of animals and man-made tools. Neuroreport. 1995 Aug 21;6(12):1637–1641. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199508000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Potter M. C., Faulconer B. A. Time to understand pictures and words. Nature. 1975 Feb 6;253(5491):437–438. doi: 10.1038/253437a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Price C. J., Humphreys G. W. The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1989 Nov;41(4):797–827. doi: 10.1080/14640748908402394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Price C. J., Moore C. J., Humphreys G. W., Frackowiak R. S., Friston K. J. The neural regions sustaining object recognition and naming. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Nov 22;263(1376):1501–1507. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ungerleider L. G. Functional brain imaging studies of cortical mechanisms for memory. Science. 1995 Nov 3;270(5237):769–775. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Van Orden G. C. A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading. Mem Cognit. 1987 May;15(3):181–198. doi: 10.3758/bf03197716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wingfield A. Effects of frequency on identification and naming of objects. Am J Psychol. 1968 Jun;81(2):226–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zeki S., Watson J. D., Lueck C. J., Friston K. J., Kennard C., Frackowiak R. S. A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex. J Neurosci. 1991 Mar;11(3):641–649. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-03-00641.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES