Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 Aug 29;352(1358):1165–1175. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0100

Knowledge-based vision and simple visual machines.

D Cliff 1, J Noble 1
PMCID: PMC1692013  PMID: 9304684

Abstract

The vast majority of work in machine vision emphasizes the representation of perceived objects and events: it is these internal representations that incorporate the 'knowledge' in knowledge-based vision or form the 'models' in model-based vision. In this paper, we discuss simple machine vision systems developed by artificial evolution rather than traditional engineering design techniques, and note that the task of identifying internal representations within such systems is made difficult by the lack of an operational definition of representation at the causal mechanistic level. Consequently, we question the nature and indeed the existence of representations posited to be used within natural vision systems (i.e. animals). We conclude that representations argued for on a priori grounds by external observers of a particular vision system may well be illusory, and are at best place-holders for yet-to-be-identified causal mechanistic interactions. That is, applying the knowledge-based vision approach in the understanding of evolved systems (machines or animals) may well lead to theories and models that are internally consistent, computationally plausible, and entirely wrong.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (184.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Lee D. N., Lishman R. Visual control of locomotion. Scand J Psychol. 1977;18(3):224–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee D. N., Young D. S., Reddish P. E., Lough S., Clayton T. M. Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1983 May;35(Pt 2):333–346. doi: 10.1080/14640748308402138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Shepard R. N., Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science. 1971 Feb 19;171(3972):701–703. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Srinivasan M. V., Laughlin S. B., Dubs A. Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1982 Nov 22;216(1205):427–459. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1982.0085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Warrington E. K., Taylor A. M. The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. Cortex. 1973 Jun;9(2):152–164. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(73)80024-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Warrington E. K., Taylor A. M. Two categorical stages of object recognition. Perception. 1978;7(6):695–705. doi: 10.1068/p070695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES