Abstract
Knowledge is often thought to be something brought from outside to act upon the visual messages received from the eye in a 'top-down' fashion, but this is a misleadingly narrow view. First, the visual system is a multilevel heterarchy with connections acting in all directions so it has no 'top'; and second, knowledge is provided through innately determined structure and by analysis of the redundancy in sensory messages themselves, as well as from outside. This paper gives evidence about mechanisms analysing sensory redundancy in biological vision. Automatic gain controls for luminance and contrast depend upon feedback from the input, and there are strong indications that the autocorrelation function, and other associations between input variables, affect the contrast sensitivity function and our subjective experience of the world. The associative structure of sensory message can provide much knowledge about the world we live in, and neural mechanisms that discount established associative structure in the input messages by recoding them can improve survival by making new structure more easily detectable. These mechanisms may be responsible for illusions, such as those produced by a concave face-mask, that are classically attributed to top-down influences.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (131.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ATTNEAVE F. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol Rev. 1954 May;61(3):183–193. doi: 10.1037/h0054663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BARLOW H. B., FITZHUGH R., KUFFLER S. W. Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 6;137(3):338–354. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barlow H. B. Pattern recognition and the responses of sensory neurons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1969 Apr 21;156(2):872–881. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb14019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carandini M., Ferster D. A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. Science. 1997 May 9;276(5314):949–952. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5314.949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Field D. J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 Dec;4(12):2379–2394. doi: 10.1364/josaa.4.002379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geisler W. S., Albrecht D. G. Bayesian analysis of identification performance in monkey visual cortex: nonlinear mechanisms and stimulus certainty. Vision Res. 1995 Oct;35(19):2723–2730. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00029-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(1):215–243. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCollough C. Color Adaptation of Edge-Detectors in the Human Visual System. Science. 1965 Sep 3;149(3688):1115–1116. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3688.1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Movshon J. A., Van Sluyters R. C. Visual neural development. Annu Rev Psychol. 1981;32:477–522. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohzawa I., Sclar G., Freeman R. D. Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. J Neurophysiol. 1985 Sep;54(3):651–667. doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.3.651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smirnakis S. M., Berry M. J., Warland D. K., Bialek W., Meister M. Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature. 1997 Mar 6;386(6620):69–73. doi: 10.1038/386069a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tolhurst D. J., Tadmor Y., Chao T. Amplitude spectra of natural images. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992 Apr;12(2):229–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1992.tb00296.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]