Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 Oct 29;352(1360):1401–1409. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0126

Spatial frames of reference and somatosensory processing: a neuropsychological perspective.

G Vallar 1
PMCID: PMC1692053  PMID: 9368928

Abstract

In patients with lesions in the right hemisphere, frequently involving the posterior parietal regions, left-sided somatosensory (and visual and motor) deficits not only reflect a disorder of primary sensory processes, but also have a higher-order component related to a defective spatial representation of the body. This additional factor, related to right brain damage, is clinically relevant: contralesional hemianaesthesia (and hemianopia and hemiplegia) is more frequent in right brain-damaged patients than in patients with damage to the left side of the brain. Three main lines of investigation suggest the existence of this higher-order pathological factor. (i) Right brain-damaged patients with left hemineglect may show physiological evidence of preserved processing of somatosensory stimuli, of which they are not aware. Similar results have been obtained in the visual domain. (ii) Direction-specific vestibular, visual optokinetic and somatosensory or proprioceptive stimulations may displace spatial frames of reference in right brain-damaged patients with left hemineglect, reducing or increasing the extent of the patients' ipsilesional rightward directional error, and bring about similar directional effects in normal subjects. These stimulations, which may improve or worsen a number of manifestations of the neglect syndrome (such as extrapersonal and personal hemineglect), have similar effects on the severity of left somatosensory deficits (defective detection of tactile stimuli, position sense disorders). However, visuospatial hemineglect and the somatosensory deficits improved by these stimulations are independent, albeit related, disorders. (iii) The severity of left somatosensory deficits is affected by the spatial position of body segments, with reference to the midsagittal plane of the trunk. A general implication of these observations is that spatial (non-somatotopic) levels of representation contribute to corporeal awareness. The neural basis of these spatial frames includes the posterior parietal and the premotor frontal regions. These spatial representations could provide perceptual-premotor interfaces for the organization of movements (e.g. pointing, locomotion) directed towards targets in personal and extrapersonal space. In line with this view, there is evidence that the sensory stimulations that modulate left somatosensory deficits affect left motor disorders in a similar, direction-specific, fashion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (216.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altman J. A., Balonov L. J., Deglin V. L. Effects of unilateral disorder of the brain hemisphere function in man on directional hearing. Neuropsychologia. 1979;17(3-4):295–301. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(79)90075-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Angelelli P., De Luca M., Spinelli D. Early visual processing in neglect patients: a study with steady-state VEPs. Neuropsychologia. 1996 Dec;34(12):1151–1157. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00036-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Battaglini P. P., Galletti C., Fattori P. Cortical mechanisms for visual perception of object motion and position in space. Behav Brain Res. 1996 Apr;76(1-2):143–154. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00192-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bisiach E., Cornacchia L., Sterzi R., Vallar G. Disorders of perceived auditory lateralization after lesions of the right hemisphere. Brain. 1984 Mar;107(Pt 1):37–52. doi: 10.1093/brain/107.1.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bisiach E., Rusconi M. L., Vallar G. Remission of somatoparaphrenic delusion through vestibular stimulation. Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(10):1029–1031. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90066-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bottini G., Paulesu E., Sterzi R., Warburton E., Wise R. J., Vallar G., Frackowiak R. S., Frith C. D. Modulation of conscious experience by peripheral sensory stimuli. Nature. 1995 Aug 31;376(6543):778–781. doi: 10.1038/376778a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cappa S., Sterzi R., Vallar G., Bisiach E. Remission of hemineglect and anosognosia during vestibular stimulation. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(5):775–782. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90115-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Castaigne P., Laplane D., Degos J. D. Trois cas de négligence motrice par lésion rétro-rolandique. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1970 Apr;122(4):233–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Corkin S., Milner B., Rasmussen T. Somatosensory thresholds--contrasting effects of postcentral-gyrus and posterior parietal-lobe excisions. Arch Neurol. 1970 Jul;23(1):41–58. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1970.00480250045007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Damasio A. R., Damasio H., Chui H. C. Neglect following damage to frontal lobe or basal ganglia. Neuropsychologia. 1980;18(2):123–132. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(80)90058-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fogassi L., Gallese V., di Pellegrino G., Fadiga L., Gentilucci M., Luppino G., Matelli M., Pedotti A., Rizzolatti G. Space coding by premotor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1992;89(3):686–690. doi: 10.1007/BF00229894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Galletti C., Battaglini P. P., Fattori P. Parietal neurons encoding spatial locations in craniotopic coordinates. Exp Brain Res. 1993;96(2):221–229. doi: 10.1007/BF00227102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Graziano M. S., Yap G. S., Gross C. G. Coding of visual space by premotor neurons. Science. 1994 Nov 11;266(5187):1054–1057. doi: 10.1126/science.7973661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Heilman K. M., Bowers D., Watson R. T. Performance on hemispatial pointing task by patients with neglect syndrome. Neurology. 1983 May;33(5):661–664. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.5.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Heilman K. M., Valenstein E. Frontal lobe neglect in man. Neurology. 1972 Jun;22(6):660–664. doi: 10.1212/wnl.22.6.660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Husain M., Kennard C. Visual neglect associated with frontal lobe infarction. J Neurol. 1996 Sep;243(9):652–657. doi: 10.1007/BF00878662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Karnath H. O., Christ K., Hartje W. Decrease of contralateral neglect by neck muscle vibration and spatial orientation of trunk midline. Brain. 1993 Apr;116(Pt 2):383–396. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.2.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Làdavas E., Paladini R., Cubelli R. Implicit associative priming in a patient with left visual neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1993 Dec;31(12):1307–1320. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90100-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mark V. W., Heilman K. M. Bodily neglect and orientational biases in unilateral neglect syndrome and normal subjects. Neurology. 1990 Apr;40(4):640–643. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.4.640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mark V. W. Motor neglect: what do we mean? Neurology. 1996 May;46(5):1492–1493. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.5.1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Marshall J. C., Halligan P. W. Blindsight and insight in visuo-spatial neglect. Nature. 1988 Dec 22;336(6201):766–767. doi: 10.1038/336766a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Meador K. J., Loring D. W., Lee G. P., Brooks B. S., Thompson E. E., Thompson W. O., Heilman K. M. Right cerebral specialization for tactile attention as evidenced by intracarotid sodium amytal. Neurology. 1988 Nov;38(11):1763–1766. doi: 10.1212/wnl.38.11.1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pause M., Kunesch E., Binkofski F., Freund H. J. Sensorimotor disturbances in patients with lesions of the parietal cortex. Brain. 1989 Dec;112(Pt 6):1599–1625. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.6.1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pizzamiglio L., Frasca R., Guariglia C., Incoccia C., Antonucci G. Effect of optokinetic stimulation in patients with visual neglect. Cortex. 1990 Dec;26(4):535–540. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80303-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rode G., Charles N., Perenin M. T., Vighetto A., Trillet M., Aimard G. Partial remission of hemiplegia and somatoparaphrenia through vestibular stimulation in a case of unilateral neglect. Cortex. 1992 Jun;28(2):203–208. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80048-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rubens A. B. Caloric stimulation and unilateral visual neglect. Neurology. 1985 Jul;35(7):1019–1024. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.7.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Smania N., Aglioti S. Sensory and spatial components of somaesthetic deficits following right brain damage. Neurology. 1995 Sep;45(9):1725–1730. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.9.1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sterzi R., Bottini G., Celani M. G., Righetti E., Lamassa M., Ricci S., Vallar G. Hemianopia, hemianaesthesia, and hemiplegia after right and left hemisphere damage. A hemispheric difference. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;56(3):308–310. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.56.3.308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vallar G., Antonucci G., Guariglia C., Pizzamiglio L. Deficits of position sense, unilateral neglect and optokinetic stimulation. Neuropsychologia. 1993 Nov;31(11):1191–1200. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90067-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vallar G., Bottini G., Rusconi M. L., Sterzi R. Exploring somatosensory hemineglect by vestibular stimulation. Brain. 1993 Feb;116(Pt 1):71–86. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Vallar G., Bottini G., Sterzi R., Passerini D., Rusconi M. L. Hemianesthesia, sensory neglect, and defective access to conscious experience. Neurology. 1991 May;41(5):650–652. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.5.650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vallar G., Guariglia C., Magnotti L., Pizzamiglio L. Optokinetic stimulation affects both vertical and horizontal deficits of position sense in unilateral neglect. Cortex. 1995 Dec;31(4):669–683. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80019-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vallar G., Guariglia C., Nico D., Bisiach E. Spatial hemineglect in back space. Brain. 1995 Apr;118(Pt 2):467–472. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.2.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vallar G., Guariglia C., Nico D., Tabossi P. Left neglect dyslexia and the processing of neglected information. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1996 Oct;18(5):733–746. doi: 10.1080/01688639608408296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vallar G., Papagno C., Rusconi M. L., Bisiach E. Vestibular stimulation, spatial hemineglect and dysphasia, selective effects. Cortex. 1995 Sep;31(3):589–593. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Vallar G., Perani D. The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(5):609–622. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Vallar G., Rusconi M. L., Bernardini B. Modulation of neglect hemianesthesia by transcutaneous electrical stimulation. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996 Sep;2(5):452–459. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700001533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vallar G., Sandroni P., Rusconi M. L., Barbieri S. Hemianopia, hemianesthesia, and spatial neglect: a study with evoked potentials. Neurology. 1991 Dec;41(12):1918–1922. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.12.1918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Vallar G., Sterzi R., Bottini G., Cappa S., Rusconi M. L. Temporary remission of left hemianesthesia after vestibular stimulation. A sensory neglect phenomenon. Cortex. 1990 Mar;26(1):123–131. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80078-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ventre J., Flandrin J. M., Jeannerod M. In search for the egocentric reference. A neurophysiological hypothesis. Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(6):797–806. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90104-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES