Skip to main content
PMC home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 Oct 29;352(1360):1411–1419. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0127

Spatial orientation and the representation of space with parietal lobe lesions.

H O Karnath 1
PMCID: PMC1692059  PMID: 9368929

Abstract

Damage to the human parietal cortex leads to disturbances of spatial perception and of motor behaviour. Within the parietal lobe, lesions of the superior and of the inferior lobule induce quite different, characteristic deficits. Patients with inferior (predominantly right) parietal lobe lesions fail to explore the contralesional part of space by eye or limb movements (spatial neglect). In contrast, superior parietal lobe lesions lead to specific impairments of goal-directed movements (optic ataxia). The observations reported in this paper support the view of dissociated functions represented in the inferior and the superior lobule of the human parietal cortex. They suggest that a spatial reference frame for exploratory behaviour is disturbed in patients with neglect. Data from these patients' visual search argue that their failure to explore the contralesional side is due to a disturbed input transformation leading to a deviation of egocentric space representation to the ipsilesional side. Data further show that this deviation follows a rotation around the earth-vertical body axis to the ipsilesional side rather than a translation towards that side. The results are in clear contrast to explanations that assume a lateral gradient ranging from a minimum of exploration in the extreme contralesional to a maximum in the extreme ipsilesional hemispace. Moreover, the failure to orient towards and to explore the contralesional part of space appears to be distinct from those deficits observed once an object of interest has been located and releases reaching. Although patients with neglect exhibit a severe bias of exploratory movements, their hand trajectories to targets in peripersonal space may follow a straight path. This result suggests that (i) exploratory and (ii) goal-directed behaviour in space do not share the same neural control mechanisms. Neural representation of space in the inferior parietal lobule seems to serve as a matrix for spatial exploration and for orienting in space but not for visuomotor processes involved in reaching for objects. Disturbances of such processes rather appear to be prominent in patients with more superior parietal lobe lesions and optic ataxia.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (209.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen R. A. Encoding of intention and spatial location in the posterior parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1995 Sep-Oct;5(5):457–469. doi: 10.1093/cercor/5.5.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chédru F., Leblanc M., Lhermitte F. Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention). Cortex. 1973 Mar;9(1):94–111. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(73)80019-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hornak J. Ocular exploration in the dark by patients with visual neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1992 Jun;30(6):547–552. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90057-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ishiai S., Furukawa T., Tsukagoshi H. Eye-fixation patterns in homonymous hemianopia and unilateral spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(4):675–679. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90058-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnston C. W., Diller L. Exploratory eye movements and visual hemi-neglect. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986 Jan;8(1):93–101. doi: 10.1080/01688638608401299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Karnath H. O., Christ K., Hartje W. Decrease of contralateral neglect by neck muscle vibration and spatial orientation of trunk midline. Brain. 1993 Apr;116(Pt 2):383–396. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.2.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Karnath H. O., Dick H., Konczak J. Kinematics of goal-directed arm movements in neglect: control of hand in space. Neuropsychologia. 1997 Apr;35(4):435–444. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00118-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Karnath H. O., Fetter M., Dichgans J. Ocular exploration of space as a function of neck proprioceptive and vestibular input--observations in normal subjects and patients with spatial neglect after parietal lesions. Exp Brain Res. 1996 May;109(2):333–342. doi: 10.1007/BF00231791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karnath H. O., Fetter M. Ocular space exploration in the dark and its relation to subjective and objective body orientation in neglect patients with parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia. 1995 Mar;33(3):371–377. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00115-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Karnath H. O., Huber W. Abnormal eye movement behaviour during text reading in neglect syndrome: a case study. Neuropsychologia. 1992 Jun;30(6):593–598. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90062-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Karnath H. O. Spatial limitation of eye movements during ocular exploration of simple line drawings in neglect syndrome. Cortex. 1994 Jun;30(2):319–330. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80202-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kinsbourne M. Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Adv Neurol. 1977;18:41–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lewald J., Ehrenstein W. H. The effect of eye position on auditory lateralization. Exp Brain Res. 1996 Mar;108(3):473–485. doi: 10.1007/BF00227270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pizzamiglio L., Frasca R., Guariglia C., Incoccia C., Antonucci G. Effect of optokinetic stimulation in patients with visual neglect. Cortex. 1990 Dec;26(4):535–540. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80303-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rizzolatti G., Berti A. Neglect as a neural representation deficit. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1990;146(10):626–634. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rorden C., Mattingley J. B., Karnath H. O., Driver J. Visual extinction and prior entry: impaired perception of temporal order with intact motion perception after unilateral parietal damage. Neuropsychologia. 1997 Apr;35(4):421–433. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00093-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rubens A. B. Caloric stimulation and unilateral visual neglect. Neurology. 1985 Jul;35(7):1019–1024. doi: 10.1212/wnl.35.7.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vallar G., Guariglia C., Nico D., Bisiach E. Spatial hemineglect in back space. Brain. 1995 Apr;118(Pt 2):467–472. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.2.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vallar G., Perani D. The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man. Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(5):609–622. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90001-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ventre J., Flandrin J. M., Jeannerod M. In search for the egocentric reference. A neurophysiological hypothesis. Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(6):797–806. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90104-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES