Skip to main content
PMC home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):275–286. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0209

Population differentiation without speciation

A E Magurran
PMCID: PMC1692201

Abstract

Population differentiation is often viewed as an important step towards speciation, and part of the rationale for conserving variation at the intraspecific level is that the potential to generate more biological diversity should be retained. Yet, speciation is not an inevitable consequence of population divergence. This paper reviews recent work on the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata, a species that is renowned for its capacity for population differentiation. Guppy populations evolve rapidly, within 101 to 102 generations, as a response to changes in selection exerted by predators. The rates of evolution involved can be up to seven orders of magnitude greater than those seen in the fossil record. Sexual selection, particuarly female choice, appears to reinforce the divergence that natural selection has generated. Perplexingly, however, there is no reproductive isolation (either prezygotic or postzygotic) between populations, even those that have been separated for at least 106 generations. Sexual conflict may be the key to explaining this absence of speciation. Male reproductive behaviour, particularly the high incidence of sneaky mating, may be instrumental in producing sufficient gene flow to prevent reproductive isolation. Sneaky mating has the potential to undermine female choice, and is known to be an important means of sperm transfer in wild populations. Sexual dimorphism, also a result of sexual conflict in guppies, may inhibit speciation in another way. Morphological differences between the sexes, that have arisen for reproductive reasons, mean that males and females are pre-adapted for different foraging niches. This, in turn, reduces the opportunity for the development of feeding polymorphisms, a mechanism that seems to have been important in the sympatric speciation of other fish species.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (265.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer L. T., Beller-Todd B., Elmore O., White G. L., Hinshaw L. B. Does sodium pentobarbital anesthesia compromise clearance of bacteria or survival of dogs in lethal E coli shock? Circ Shock. 1981;8(1):59–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dugatkin L. A., Godin J. G. Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Aug 22;249(1325):179–184. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ehlinger T. J., Wilson D. S. Complex foraging polymorphism in bluegill sunfish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(6):1878–1882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.6.1878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Endler J. A. Variation in the appearance of guppy color patterns to guppies and their predators under different visual conditions. Vision Res. 1991;31(3):587–608. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90109-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haskins C. P., Haskins E. F. Factors Governing Sexual Selection as an Isolating Mechanism in the Poeciliid Fish Lebistes Reticulatus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1950 Sep;36(9):464–476. doi: 10.1073/pnas.36.9.464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Houde A. E., Endler J. A. Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science. 1990 Jun 15;248(4961):1405–1408. doi: 10.1126/science.248.4961.1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson TC, Scholz CA, Talbot MR, Kelts K, Ricketts RD, Ngobi G, Beuning K, Ssemmanda I, I, McGill JW. Late Pleistocene Desiccation of Lake Victoria and Rapid Evolution of Cichlid Fishes. Science. 1996 Aug 23;273(5278):1091–1093. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5278.1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kushlinskii N. E., Liubimova N. V., Lemeshko A. O., Vasil'ev A. V., Davydov M. I. Klinicheskoe znachenie opukholevykh markerov SAIFRA 21-1 i neironspetsificheskoi enolazy pri rake legkogo. Biull Eksp Biol Med. 1997 Jan;123(1):98–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lafleur DL, Lozano GA, Sclafani M. Female mate-choice copying in guppies, Poecilia reticulata: a re-evaluation. Anim Behav. 1997 Sep;54(3):579–586. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721–3725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lynch M. Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Sep;5(5):584–599. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Magurran A. E. Battle of the sexes. Nature. 1996 Sep 26;383(6598):307–307. doi: 10.1038/383307a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meyer A., Kocher T. D., Basasibwaki P., Wilson A. C. Monophyletic origin of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes suggested by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Nature. 1990 Oct 11;347(6293):550–553. doi: 10.1038/347550a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  15. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  16. Reynolds J., Weir B. S., Cockerham C. C. Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics. 1983 Nov;105(3):767–779. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.3.767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Reznick DN, Shaw FH, Rodd FH, Shaw RG. Evaluation of the Rate of Evolution in Natural Populations of Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) Science. 1997 Mar 28;275(5308):1934–1937. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5308.1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rice W. R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature. 1996 May 16;381(6579):232–234. doi: 10.1038/381232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schliewen U. K., Tautz D., Päbo S. Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids. Nature. 1994 Apr 14;368(6472):629–632. doi: 10.1038/368629a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES