Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):241–249. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0206

Revealing the factors that promote speciation

T G Barraclough
PMCID: PMC1692202

Abstract

What biological attributes of organisms promote speciation, and ultimately, species diversity? This question has a long history of interest, with proposed diversity promoters including attributes such as sexual selection, ecological specialism and dispersability. However, such ideas are difficult to test because the time-scale of processes involved is too great for direct human observation and experimentation. An increasingly powerful solution is to investigate diversity patterns among extant groups to infer the nature of processes operating during the evolution of those groups. This approach relies on the use of robust, phylogenetically based null models to overcome some of the problems inherent in observational inference. We illustrate this area by (i) discussing recent advances in identifying correlates of diversity among higher taxa, and (ii) proposing new methods for analysing patterns in species-level phylogenies, drawing examples from a wide range of organisms.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (208.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bromham L., Rambaut A., Harvey P. H. Determinants of rate variation in mammalian DNA sequence evolution. J Mol Evol. 1996 Dec;43(6):610–621. doi: 10.1007/BF02202109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Coyne J. A. Genetics and speciation. Nature. 1992 Feb 6;355(6360):511–515. doi: 10.1038/355511a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gittleman J. L., Purvis A. Body size and species-richness in carnivores and primates. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Jan 22;265(1391):113–119. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jablonski D. Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of cretaceous mollusks. Science. 1987 Oct 16;238(4825):360–363. doi: 10.1126/science.238.4825.360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721–3725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nee S., Harvey P. H. Getting to the roots of flowering plant diversity. Science. 1994 Jun 10;264(5165):1549–1550. doi: 10.1126/science.264.5165.1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Orr H. A. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics. 1995 Apr;139(4):1805–1813. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.4.1805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Purvis A. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 29;348(1326):405–421. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sanderson M. J., Donoghue M. J. Shifts in diversification rate with the origin of angiosperms. Science. 1994 Jun 10;264(5165):1590–1593. doi: 10.1126/science.264.5165.1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith J. J., Bush G. L. Phylogeny of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae) inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997 Feb;7(1):33–43. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES