Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):219–230. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0204

Species-range size distributions: products of speciation, extinction and transformation

K J Gaston
PMCID: PMC1692215

Abstract

One basic summary of the spatial pattern of biodiversity across the surface of the Earth is provided by a species-range size distribution, the frequency distribution of the numbers of species exhibiting geographic ranges of different sizes. Although widely considered to be approximately lognormal, increasingly it appears that across a variety of groups of organisms this distribution systematically departs from such a form. Whatever its detailed shape, however, the distribution must arise as a product of three processes, speciation, extinction and transformation (the temporal dynamics of the range sizes of species during their life times). Considering the role potentially played by each of these processes necessitates drawing on information from a diverse array of research fields, and highlights the possible role of geographic range size as a common currency uniting them.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (336.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hansen T. A. Larval dispersal and species longevity in lower tertiary gastropods. Science. 1978 Feb 24;199(4331):885–887. doi: 10.1126/science.199.4331.885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jablonski D. Background and mass extinctions: the alternation of macroevolutionary regimes. Science. 1986 Jan 10;231(4734):129–133. doi: 10.1126/science.231.4734.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jablonski D. Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of cretaceous mollusks. Science. 1987 Oct 16;238(4825):360–363. doi: 10.1126/science.238.4825.360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jablonski D. In reply: estimates of species duration. Science. 1988 May 20;240(4855):969–969. doi: 10.1126/science.240.4855.969-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jablonski D., Raup D. M. Selectivity of end-Cretaceous marine bivalve extinctions. Science. 1995 Apr 21;268(5209):389–391. doi: 10.1126/science.11536722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Russell M. P., Lindberg D. R. Estimates of species duration. Science. 1988 May 20;240(4855):969–969. doi: 10.1126/science.240.4855.969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schliewen U. K., Tautz D., Päbo S. Sympatric speciation suggested by monophyly of crater lake cichlids. Nature. 1994 Apr 14;368(6472):629–632. doi: 10.1038/368629a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES