Abstract
The role of sexual selection in speciation is investigated, addressing two main issues. First, how do sexually selected traits become species recognition traits? Theory and empirical evidence suggest that female preferences often do not evolve as a correlated response to evolution of male traits. This implies that, contrary to runaway (Fisherian) models of sexual selection, premating isolation will not arise as an automatic side effect of divergence between populations in sexually selected traits. I evaluate premating isolating mechanisms in one group, the birds. In this group premating isolation is often a consequence of sexual imprinting, whereby young birds learn features of their parents and use these features in mate choice. Song, morphology and plumage are known recognition cues. I conclude that perhaps the main role for sexual selection in speciation is in generating differences between populations in traits. Sexual imprinting then leads to these traits being used as species recognition mechanisms. The second issue addressed in this paper is the role of sexual selection in adaptive radiation, again concentrating on birds. Ecological differences between species include large differences in size, which may in themselves be sufficient for species recognition, and differences in habitat, which seem to evolve frequently and at all stages of an adaptive radiation. Differences in habitat often cause song and plumage patterns to evolve as a result of sexual selection for efficient communication. Therefore sexual selection is likely to have an important role in generating premating isolating mechanisms throughout an adaptive radiation. It is also possible that sexual selection, by creating more allopatric species, creates more opportunity for ecological divergence to occur. The limited available evidence does not support this idea. A role for sexual selection in accelerating ecological diversification has yet to be demonstrated.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (209.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Grant P. R., Grant B. R. Genetics and the origin of bird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 22;94(15):7768–7775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.15.7768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houde A. E., Endler J. A. Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science. 1990 Jun 15;248(4961):1405–1408. doi: 10.1126/science.248.4961.1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iwasa Y., Pomiankowski A. Continual change in mate preferences. Nature. 1995 Oct 5;377(6548):420–422. doi: 10.1038/377420a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krakauer D. C., Johnstone R. A. The evolution of exploitation and honesty in animal communication: a model using artificial neural networks. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995 May 30;348(1325):355–361. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721–3725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nee S., Mooers A. O., Harvey P. H. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):8322–8326. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richman A. D., Price T. Evolution of ecological differences in the Old World leaf warblers. Nature. 1992 Feb 27;355(6363):817–821. doi: 10.1038/355817a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schluter D., Price T. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Jul 22;253(1336):117–122. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber K. E. Large genetic change at small fitness cost in large populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for wind tunnel flight: rethinking fitness surfaces. Genetics. 1996 Sep;144(1):205–213. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zink R. M., Slowinski J. B. Evidence from molecular systematics for decreased avian diversification in the pleistocene Epoch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jun 20;92(13):5832–5835. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.13.5832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]