Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Mar 29;353(1367):389–397. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0217

The coevolution of human fertility and wealth inheritance strategies.

R Mace 1
PMCID: PMC1692221  PMID: 9569432

Abstract

Life history theory concerns the scheduling of births and the level of parental investment in each offspring. In most human societies the inheritance of wealth is an important part of parental investment. Patterns of wealth inheritance and other reproductive decisions, such as family size, would be expected to influence each other. Here I present an adaptive model of human reproductive decision-making, using a state-dependent dynamic model. Two decisions made by parents are considered: when to have another baby, and thus the pattern of reproduction through life; and how to allocate resources between children at the end of the parents' life. Optimal decision rules are those that maximize the number of grandchildren. Decisions are assumed to depend on the state of the parent, which is described at any time by two variables: number of living sons, and wealth. The dynamics of the model are based on a traditional African pastoralist system, but it is general enough to approximate to any means of subsistence where an increase in the amount of wealth owned increases the capacity for future production of resources. The model is used to show that, in the unpredictable environment of a traditional pastoralist society, high fertility and a biasing of wealth inheritance to a small number of children are frequently optimal. Most such societies are now undergoing a transition to lower fertility, known as the demographic transition. The effects on fertility and wealth inheritance strategies of reducing mortality risks, reducing the unpredictability of the environment and increasing the costs of raising children are explored. Reducing mortality has little effect on completed family sizes of living children or on the wealth they inherit. Increasing the costs of raising children decreases optimal fertility and increases the inheritance left to each child at each level of wealth, and has the potential to reduce fertility to very low levels. The results offer an explanation for why wealthy families are frequently also those with the smallest number of children in heterogeneous, post-transition societies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (224.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alam N. Birth spacing and infant and early childhood mortality in a high fertility area of Bangladesh: age-dependent and interactive effects. J Biosoc Sci. 1995 Oct;27(4):393–404. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000023002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bøhler E., Bergström S. Subsequent pregnancy affects morbidity of previous child. J Biosoc Sci. 1995 Oct;27(4):431–442. doi: 10.1017/s002193200002304x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mace R. Biased parental investment and reproductive success in Gabbra pastoralists. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 1996 Feb;38(2):75–81. doi: 10.1007/s002650050219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mace R., Sear R. Birth interval and the sex of children in a traditional African population: an evolutionary analysis. J Biosoc Sci. 1997 Oct;29(4):499–507. doi: 10.1017/s0021932097004999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mace R., Sear R. Maternal mortality in a Kenyan pastoralist population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996 Aug;54(2):137–141. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(96)02691-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Madise N. J., Diamond I. Determinants of infant mortality in Malawi: an analysis to control for death clustering within families. J Biosoc Sci. 1995 Jan;27(1):95–106. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000007033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Marrow P., McNamara J. M., Houston A. I., Stevenson I. R., Clutton-Brock T. H. State-dependent life history evolution in Soay sheep: dynamic modelling of reproductive scheduling. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Jan 29;351(1335):17–32. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pison G., Trape J. F., Lefebvre M., Enel C. Rapid decline in child mortality in a rural area of Senegal. Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Feb;22(1):72–80. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.1.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Trivers R. L., Willard D. E. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90–92. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Weaver L. T., Beckerleg S. Is health a sustainable state? A village study in The Gambia. Lancet. 1993 May 22;341(8856):1327–1330. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90827-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES