Skip to main content
PMC home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Jul 29;353(1372):1221–1237. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0278

The platypus is not a rodent: DNA hybridization, amniote phylogeny and the palimpsest theory.

J A Kirsch 1, G C Mayer 1
PMCID: PMC1692306  PMID: 9720117

Abstract

We present DNA-hybridization data on 21 amniotes and two anurans showing that discrimination is obtained among most of these at the class and lower levels. Trees generated from these data largely agree with conventional views, for example in not associating birds and mammals. However, the sister relationships found here of the monotremes to marsupials, and of turtles to the alligator, are surprising results which are nonetheless consistent with the results of some other studies. The Marsupionta hypothesis of Gregory is reviewed, as are opinions about the placement of chelonians. Anatomical and reproductive data considered by Gregory do not unequivocally preclude a marsupial-monotreme special relationship, and there is other recent evidence for placing turtles within the Diapsida. We conclude that the evidential meaning of the molecular data is as shown in the trees, but that the topologies may be influenced by a base-compositional bias producing a seemingly slow evolutionary rate in monotremes, or by algorithmic artefacts (in the case of turtles as well).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (351.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer C. B., Wells R. S., MacDonald D. M. Metastatic cutaneous carcinoid. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985 Aug;13(2 Pt 2):363–366. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(85)70175-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnason U., Gullberg A., Janke A. Phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial DNA suggest a sister group relationship between Xenarthra (Edentata) and Ferungulates. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Jul;14(7):762–768. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benton M. J. Phylogeny of the major tetrapod groups: morphological data and divergence dates. J Mol Evol. 1990 May;30(5):409–424. doi: 10.1007/BF02101113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blackburn D. G., Vitt L. J., Beuchat C. A. Eutherian-like reproductive specializations in a viviparous reptile. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(15):4860–4863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Edwards A. W. Phylogenetic analysis. Models and estimation procedures. Am J Hum Genet. 1967 May;19(3 Pt 1):233–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark C. T., Smith K. K. Cranial osteogenesis in Monodelphis domestica (Didelphidae) and Macropus eugenii (Macropodidae). J Morphol. 1993 Feb;215(2):119–149. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1052150203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. D'Erchia A. M., Gissi C., Pesole G., Saccone C., Arnason U. The guinea-pig is not a rodent. Nature. 1996 Jun 13;381(6583):597–600. doi: 10.1038/381597a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eernisse D. J., Kluge A. G. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Nov;10(6):1170–1195. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Graur D., Hide W. A., Li W. H. Is the guinea-pig a rodent? Nature. 1991 Jun 20;351(6328):649–652. doi: 10.1038/351649a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hedges S. B., Moberg K. D., Maxson L. R. Tetrapod phylogeny inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA sequences and a review of the evidence for amniote relationships. Mol Biol Evol. 1990 Nov;7(6):607–633. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hedges S. B. Molecular evidence for the origin of birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 29;91(7):2621–2624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hu Y., Wang Y., Luo Z., Li C. A new symmetrodont mammal from China and its implications for mammalian evolution. Nature. 1997 Nov 13;390(6656):137–142. doi: 10.1038/36505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hutcheon J. M., Kirsch J. A., Pettigrew J. D. Base-compositional biases and the bat problem. III. The questions of microchiropteran monophyly. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Apr 29;353(1368):607–617. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Janke A., Arnason U. The complete mitochondrial genome of Alligator mississippiensis and the separation between recent archosauria (birds and crocodiles). Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Dec;14(12):1266–1272. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Janke A., Xu X., Arnason U. The complete mitochondrial genome of the wallaroo (Macropus robustus) and the phylogenetic relationship among Monotremata, Marsupialia, and Eutheria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 18;94(4):1276–1281. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jenkins F. A., Jr, Gatesy S. M., Shubin N. H., Amaral W. W. Haramiyids and Triassic mammalian evolution. Nature. 1997 Feb 20;385(6618):715–718. doi: 10.1038/385715a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kirsch J. A., Pettigrew J. D. Base-compositional biases and the bat problem. II. DNA-hybridization trees based on AT- and GC-enriched tracers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 29;353(1367):381–388. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kirsch J. A., Springer M. S., Krajewski C., Archer M., Aplin K., Dickerman A. W. DNA/DNA hybridization studies of the carnivorous marsupials. I: The intergeneric relationships of bandicoots (Marsupialia: Perameloidea). J Mol Evol. 1990 May;30(5):434–448. doi: 10.1007/BF02101115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Klima M. Early development of the shoulder girdle and sternum in marsupials (Mammalia: Metatheria). Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 1987;109:1–91. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-72994-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumazawa Y., Nishida M. Variations in mitochondrial tRNA gene organization of reptiles as phylogenetic markers. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):759–772. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lapointe F. J., Kirsch J. A., Bleiweiss R. Jackknifing of weighted trees: validation of phylogenies reconstructed from distance matrices. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1994 Sep;3(3):256–267. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1994.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Loomis W. F., Smith D. W. Molecular phylogeny of Dictyostelium discoideum by protein sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(23):9093–9097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.23.9093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mannen H., Tsoi S. C., Krushkal J. S., Li W. H., Li S. S. The cDNA cloning and molecular evolution of reptile and pigeon lactate dehydrogenase isozymes. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Nov;14(11):1081–1087. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Page R. D. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996 Aug;12(4):357–358. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pettigrew J. D. Genomic evolution. Flying DNA. Curr Biol. 1994 Mar 1;4(3):277–280. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00065-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pettigrew J. D., Kirsch A. W. Base-compositional biases and the bat problem. I. DNA-hybridization melting curves based on AT- and GC-enriched tracers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 29;353(1367):369–379. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Porter C. A., Goodman M., Stanhope M. J. Evidence on mammalian phylogeny from sequences of exon 28 of the von Willebrand factor gene. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1996 Feb;5(1):89–101. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sabeur G., Macaya G., Kadi F., Bernardi G. The isochore patterns of mammalian genomes and their phylogenetic implications. J Mol Evol. 1993 Aug;37(2):93–108. doi: 10.1007/BF02407344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Seutin G., Lang B. F., Mindell D. P., Morais R. Evolution of the WANCY region in amniote mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 May;11(3):329–340. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharman G. B. Reproductive physiology of marsupials. Science. 1970 Feb 27;167(3922):1221–1228. doi: 10.1126/science.167.3922.1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sheldon F. H., Bledsoe A. H. Indexes to the reassociation and stability of solution DNA hybrids. J Mol Evol. 1989 Oct;29(4):328–343. doi: 10.1007/BF02103620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Smith K. K. Development of craniofacial musculature in Monodelphis domestica (Marsupialia, Didelphidae). J Morphol. 1994 Nov;222(2):149–173. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1052220204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES