Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Jul 29;353(1372):1063–1079. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0266

New information about the skull and dentary of the Miocene platypus Obdurodon dicksoni, and a discussion of ornithorhynchid relationships.

A M Musser 1, M Archer 1
PMCID: PMC1692307  PMID: 9720105

Abstract

A reconstruction of the skull, dentary and dentition of the middle Miocene ornithorhynchid Obdurodon dicksoni has been made possible by acquisition of nearly complete cranial and dental material. Access to new anatomical work on the living platypus, Ornithorhynchus anatinus, and the present comparative study of the cranial foramina of Ob. dicksoni and Or. anatinus have provided new insights into the evolution of the ornithorhynchid skull. The hypertrophied bill in Ob. dicksoni is seen here as possibly apomorphic, although evidence from ontogenetic studies of Or. anatinus suggests that the basic form of the bill in Ob. dicksoni (where the rostral crura meet at the midline) may be ancestral to the form of the bill in Or. anatinus (where the rostral crura meet at the midline in the embryonic platypus but diverge in the adult). Differences in the relative positions of cranial structures, and in the relationships of certain cranial foramina, indicate that the cranium may have become secondarily shortened in Or. anatinus, possibly evolving from a more elongate skull type such as that of Ob. dicksoni. The plesiomorphic dentary of Ob. dicksoni, with well-developed coronoid and angular processes, contrasts with the dentary of Or. anatinus, in which the processes are almost vestigial, as well as with the dentary of the late Oligocene, congeneric Ob. insignis, in which the angular process appears to be reduced (the coronoid process is missing). In this regard the dentary of Ob. insignis seems to be morphologically closer to Or. anatinus than is the dentary of the younger Ob. dicksoni. Phylogenetic conclusions differ from previous analyses in viewing the northern Australian Ob. dicksoni as possibly derived in possessing a hypertrophied bill and dorsoventrally flattened skull and dentary, perhaps being a specialized branch of the Obdurodon line rather than ancestral to species of Ornithorhynchus. The presence of functional teeth and the robust, flattened skull and dentary in Ob. dicksoni argue for differences in diet and lifestyle between this extinct ornithorhynchid and the living Ornithorhynchus.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (344.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer C. B., Wells R. S., MacDonald D. M. Metastatic cutaneous carcinoid. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985 Aug;13(2 Pt 2):363–366. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(85)70175-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gregory J. E., Iggo A., McIntyre A. K., Proske U. Responses of electroreceptors in the snout of the echidna. J Physiol. 1989 Jul;414:521–538. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu Y., Wang Y., Luo Z., Li C. A new symmetrodont mammal from China and its implications for mammalian evolution. Nature. 1997 Nov 13;390(6656):137–142. doi: 10.1038/36505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Janke A., Xu X., Arnason U. The complete mitochondrial genome of the wallaroo (Macropus robustus) and the phylogenetic relationship among Monotremata, Marsupialia, and Eutheria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 18;94(4):1276–1281. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kesteven H. L., Furst H. C. The Skull of Ornithorhynchus, its Later Development and Adult Features. J Anat. 1929 Jul;63(Pt 4):447–472.1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. Retief J. D., Winkfein R. J., Dixon G. H. Evolution of the monotremes. The sequences of the protamine P1 genes of platypus and echidna. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Dec 1;218(2):457–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18396.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rich T. H., Vickers-Rich P., Constantine A., Flannery T. F., Kool L., van Klaveren N. A tribosphenic mammal from the Mesozoic of Australia. Science. 1997 Nov 21;278(5342):1438–1442. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5342.1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Scheich H., Langner G., Tidemann C., Coles R. B., Guppy A. Electroreception and electrolocation in platypus. 1986 Jan 30-Feb 5Nature. 319(6052):401–402. doi: 10.1038/319401a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Turner W. The Dumb-Bell Shaped Bone in the Palate of Ornithorhynchus compared with the Pre-nasal Bone of the Pig. J Anat Physiol. 1885 Jan;19(Pt 2):214–217. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zeller U. The lamina cribrosa of Ornithorhynchus (Monotremata, Mammalia). Anat Embryol (Berl) 1988;178(6):513–519. doi: 10.1007/BF00305038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES