Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1385–1393. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0292

Action-based mechanisms of attention.

S P Tipper 1, L A Howard 1, G Houghton 1
PMCID: PMC1692337  PMID: 9770231

Abstract

Actions, which have effects in the external world, must be spatiotopically represented in the brain. The brain is capable of representing space in many different forms (e.g. retinotopic-, environment-, head- or shoulder-centred), but we maintain that actions are represented in action-centred space, meaning that, at the cellular level, the direction of movement is defined by the activity of cells. In reaching, for example, object location is defined as the direction and distance between the origin of the hand and the target. Most importantly, we argue that more than one task-relevant action can be evoked at any moment in time. Therefore, highly efficient selection processes that accurately link vision and action have had to evolve. Research is reviewed which supports the notion of action-based inhibitory mechanisms that select the target from competing distractors.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (249.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen R. A., Zipser D. The role of the posterior parietal cortex in coordinate transformations for visual-motor integration. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1988 Apr;66(4):488–501. doi: 10.1139/y88-078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bower T. G. Object perception in infants. Perception. 1972;1(1):15–30. doi: 10.1068/p010015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bridgeman B., Lewis S., Heit G., Nagle M. Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Nov;5(4):692–700. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.4.692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coles M. G., Gratton G., Bashore T. R., Eriksen C. W., Donchin E. A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Oct;11(5):529–553. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.11.5.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Diamond A. Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys, and the neural bases of, inhibitory control in reaching. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;608:637–676. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb48913.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Duncan-Johnson C. C., Kopell B. S. The Stroop effect: brain potentials localize the source of interference. Science. 1981 Nov 20;214(4523):938–940. doi: 10.1126/science.7302571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eriksen C. W., Schultz D. W. Information processing in visual search: a continuous flow conception and experimental results. Percept Psychophys. 1979 Apr;25(4):249–263. doi: 10.3758/bf03198804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FITTS P. M., PETERSON J. R. INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. J Exp Psychol. 1964 Feb;67:103–112. doi: 10.1037/h0045689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Findlay J. M. Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements. Vision Res. 1982;22(8):1033–1045. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(82)90040-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Georgopoulos A. P. Neural coding of the direction of reaching and a comparison with saccadic eye movements. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1990;55:849–859. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1990.055.01.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Goldberg M. E., Segraves M. A. Visuospatial and motor attention in the monkey. Neuropsychologia. 1987;25(1A):107–118. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(87)90047-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gratton G., Coles M. G., Sirevaag E. J., Eriksen C. W., Donchin E. Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Aug;14(3):331–344. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.14.3.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kalaska J. F., Caminiti R., Georgopoulos A. P. Cortical mechanisms related to the direction of two-dimensional arm movements: relations in parietal area 5 and comparison with motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1983;51(2):247–260. doi: 10.1007/BF00237200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kalaska J. F. The representation of arm movements in postcentral and parietal cortex. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1988 Apr;66(4):455–463. doi: 10.1139/y88-075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Klapp S. T. Reaction time analysis of programmed control. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1977;5:231–253. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lhermitte F. 'Utilization behaviour' and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain. 1983 Jun;106(Pt 2):237–255. doi: 10.1093/brain/106.2.237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Miller J., Hackley S. A. Electrophysiological evidence for temporal overlap among contingent mental processes. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992 Jun;121(2):195–209. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.121.2.195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Posner M. I. Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3–25. doi: 10.1080/00335558008248231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rosenbaum D. A. Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):444–474. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Simon J. R. Effect of ear stimulated on reaction time and movement time. J Exp Psychol. 1968 Oct;78(2):344–346. doi: 10.1037/h0026288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Soechting J. F., Flanders M. Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. J Neurophysiol. 1989 Aug;62(2):582–594. doi: 10.1152/jn.1989.62.2.582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tipper S. P., Brehaut J. C., Driver J. Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Aug;16(3):492–504. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.3.492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tipper S. P., Lortie C., Baylis G. C. Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):891–905. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tipper S. P. The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1985 Nov;37(4):571–590. doi: 10.1080/14640748508400920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tipper S. P., Weaver B., Jerreat L. M., Burak A. L. Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Jun;20(3):478–499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Treisman A. M., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97–136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES