Skip to main content
PMC home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Nov 29;353(1377):1915–1927. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0344

Attention, self-regulation and consciousness.

M I Posner 1, M K Rothbart 1
PMCID: PMC1692414  PMID: 9854264

Abstract

Consciousness has many aspects. These include awareness of the world, feelings of control over one's behaviour and mental state (volition), and the notion of continuing self. Focal (executive) attention is used to control details of our awareness and is thus closely related to volition. Experiments suggest an integrated network of neural areas involved in executive attention. This network is associated with our voluntary ability to select among competing items, to correct error and to regulate our emotions. Recent neuroimaging studies suggest that these various functions involve separate areas of the anterior cingulate. We have adopted a strategy of using marker tasks, shown to activate the brain area by imaging studies, as a means of tracing the development of attentional networks. Executive attention appears to develop first to regulate distress during the first year of life. During later childhood the ability to regulate conflict among competing stimuli builds upon the earlier cingulate anatomy to provide a means of cognitive control. During childhood the activation of cingulate structures relates both to the child's success on laboratory tasks involving conflict and to parental reports of self-regulation and emotional control. These studies indicate a start in understanding the anatomy, circuitry and development of executive attention networks that serve to regulate both cognition and emotion.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (251.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abdullaev Y. G., Bechtereva N. P. Neuronal correlate of the higher-order semantic code in human prefrontal cortex in language tasks. Int J Psychophysiol. 1993 May;14(3):167–177. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(93)90031-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdullaev Y. G., Posner M. I. Event-related brain potential imaging of semantic encoding during processing single words. Neuroimage. 1998 Jan;7(1):1–13. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Badgaiyan R. D., Posner M. I. Mapping the cingulate cortex in response selection and monitoring. Neuroimage. 1998 Apr;7(3):255–260. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bench C. J., Frith C. D., Grasby P. M., Friston K. J., Paulesu E., Frackowiak R. S., Dolan R. J. Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia. 1993 Sep;31(9):907–922. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90147-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Braun A. R., Balkin T. J., Wesenten N. J., Carson R. E., Varga M., Baldwin P., Selbie S., Belenky G., Herscovitch P. Regional cerebral blood flow throughout the sleep-wake cycle. An H2(15)O PET study. Brain. 1997 Jul;120(Pt 7):1173–1197. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.7.1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bush G., Whalen P. J., Rosen B. R., Jenike M. A., McInerney S. C., Rauch S. L. The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging--validation study with functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 1998;6(4):270–282. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:4<270::AID-HBM6>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carter C. S., Mintun M., Cohen J. D. Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: an H215O PET study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage. 1995 Dec;2(4):264–272. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Demb J. B., Desmond J. E., Wagner A. D., Vaidya C. J., Glover G. H., Gabrieli J. D. Semantic encoding and retrieval in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: a functional MRI study of task difficulty and process specificity. J Neurosci. 1995 Sep;15(9):5870–5878. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-09-05870.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Derbyshire S. W., Vogt B. A., Jones A. K. Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Jan;118(1):52–60. doi: 10.1007/s002210050254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Derryberry D., Rothbart M. K. Arousal, affect, and attention as components of temperament. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Dec;55(6):958–966. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.55.6.958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Devinsky O., Morrell M. J., Vogt B. A. Contributions of anterior cingulate cortex to behaviour. Brain. 1995 Feb;118(Pt 1):279–306. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.1.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gerstadt C. L., Hong Y. J., Diamond A. The relationship between cognition and action: performance of children 3 1/2-7 years old on a Stroop-like day-night test. Cognition. 1994 Nov;53(2):129–153. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90068-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Iwasaki S. Spatial attention and two modes of visual consciousness. Cognition. 1993 Dec;49(3):211–233. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90005-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jerger S., Martin R. C., Pirozzolo F. J. A developmental study of the auditory Stroop effect. Brain Lang. 1988 Sep;35(1):86–104. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(88)90102-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lane R. D., Reiman E. M., Axelrod B., Yun L. S., Holmes A., Schwartz G. E. Neural correlates of levels of emotional awareness. Evidence of an interaction between emotion and attention in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Jul;10(4):525–535. doi: 10.1162/089892998562924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Maquet P., Péters J., Aerts J., Delfiore G., Degueldre C., Luxen A., Franck G. Functional neuroanatomy of human rapid-eye-movement sleep and dreaming. Nature. 1996 Sep 12;383(6596):163–166. doi: 10.1038/383163a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Marcel A. J. Conscious and unconscious perception: experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cogn Psychol. 1983 Apr;15(2):197–237. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90009-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morgan M. A., Romanski L. M., LeDoux J. E. Extinction of emotional learning: contribution of medial prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Lett. 1993 Nov 26;163(1):109–113. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90241-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pardo J. V., Pardo P. J., Janer K. W., Raichle M. E. The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(1):256–259. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Posner M. I. Attention: the mechanisms of consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 2;91(16):7398–7403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Posner M. I., Petersen S. E. The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:25–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rabbitt P. Time to detect errors as a function of factors affecting choice-response time. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1967;27:131–142. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(67)90053-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Raichle M. E., Fiez J. A., Videen T. O., MacLeod A. M., Pardo J. V., Fox P. T., Petersen S. E. Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. Cereb Cortex. 1994 Jan-Feb;4(1):8–26. doi: 10.1093/cercor/4.1.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rainville P., Duncan G. H., Price D. D., Carrier B., Bushnell M. C. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science. 1997 Aug 15;277(5328):968–971. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5328.968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shallice T., Burgess P. The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1405–1412. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1996.0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Snyder A. Z., Abdullaev Y. G., Posner M. I., Raichle M. E. Scalp electrical potentials reflect regional cerebral blood flow responses during processing of written words. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Feb 28;92(5):1689–1693. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Spitzer M., Bellemann M. E., Kammer T., Gückel F., Kischka U., Maier S., Schwartz A., Brix G. Functional MR imaging of semantic information processing and learning-related effects using psychometrically controlled stimulation paradigms. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Oct;4(3):149–161. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(96)00028-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Taylor S. F., Kornblum S., Minoshima S., Oliver L. M., Koeppe R. A. Changes in medial cortical blood flow with a stimulus-response compatibility task. Neuropsychologia. 1994 Feb;32(2):249–255. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90010-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES