Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Mar 29;354(1383):653–658. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0417

Interactions between tobacco mosaic virus and the tobacco N gene.

F L Erickson 1, S P Dinesh-Kumar 1, S Holzberg 1, C V Ustach 1, M Dutton 1, V Handley 1, C Corr 1, B J Baker 1
PMCID: PMC1692539  PMID: 10212945

Abstract

The interaction between tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and tobacco harbouring the N gene is a classical system for studying gene-for-gene interactions in disease resistance. The N gene confers resistance to TMV by mediating defence responses that function to limit viral replication and movement. We isolated the N gene and determined that N belongs to the nucleotide-binding-site-leucine-rich-repeat (NBS-LRR) class of plant disease resistance genes, and encodes both full-length and truncated proteins. Sequence homologies and mutagenesis studies indicated a signalling role for the N protein similar to that seen for proteins involved in defence responses in insects and mammals. The N gene confers resistance to TMV in transgenic tomato, demonstrating the use of the NBS-LRR class of disease resistance genes in engineering crop resistance. From the pathogen side of this interaction, the TMV 126 kDa replicase protein has been implicated as the avirulence factor that triggers N-mediated defence responses. We employed Agrobacterium-mediated expression strategies to demonstrate that expression of the putative helicase region of the replicase protein is sufficient to elicit N-mediated defences. The thermosensitivity of the N-mediated response to TMV is retained when induced by expression of this replicase fragment. Thus, both components of this gene-for-gene interaction are now available for studies that address the molecular mechanisms involved in N-mediated TMV resistance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (147.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker B., Zambryski P., Staskawicz B., Dinesh-Kumar S. P. Signaling in plant-microbe interactions. Science. 1997 May 2;276(5313):726–733. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5313.726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cao H., Glazebrook J., Clarke J. D., Volko S., Dong X. The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell. 1997 Jan 10;88(1):57–63. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81858-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carrington J. C., Jensen P. E., Schaad M. C. Genetic evidence for an essential role for potyvirus CI protein in cell-to-cell movement. Plant J. 1998 May;14(4):393–400. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Century K. S., Shapiro A. D., Repetti P. P., Dahlbeck D., Holub E., Staskawicz B. J. NDR1, a pathogen-induced component required for Arabidopsis disease resistance. Science. 1997 Dec 12;278(5345):1963–1965. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5345.1963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deom C. M., Wolf S., Holt C. A., Lucas W. J., Beachy R. N. Altered function of the tobacco mosaic virus movement protein in a hypersensitive host. Virology. 1991 Jan;180(1):251–256. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90029-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dietrich R. A., Richberg M. H., Schmidt R., Dean C., Dangl J. L. A novel zinc finger protein is encoded by the Arabidopsis LSD1 gene and functions as a negative regulator of plant cell death. Cell. 1997 Mar 7;88(5):685–694. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81911-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dixon M. S., Jones D. A., Keddie J. S., Thomas C. M., Harrison K., Jones J. D. The tomato Cf-2 disease resistance locus comprises two functional genes encoding leucine-rich repeat proteins. Cell. 1996 Feb 9;84(3):451–459. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81290-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fields S., Sternglanz R. The two-hybrid system: an assay for protein-protein interactions. Trends Genet. 1994 Aug;10(8):286–292. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90012-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenberg Jean T. PROGRAMMED CELL DEATH IN PLANT-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Jun;48(NaN):525–545. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Habili N., Symons R. H. Evolutionary relationship between luteoviruses and other RNA plant viruses based on sequence motifs in their putative RNA polymerases and nucleic acid helicases. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Dec 11;17(23):9543–9555. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.23.9543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heguy A., Baldari C. T., Macchia G., Telford J. L., Melli M. Amino acids conserved in interleukin-1 receptors (IL-1Rs) and the Drosophila toll protein are essential for IL-1R signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 1992 Feb 5;267(4):2605–2609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones D. A., Thomas C. M., Hammond-Kosack K. E., Balint-Kurti P. J., Jones J. D. Isolation of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum by transposon tagging. Science. 1994 Nov 4;266(5186):789–793. doi: 10.1126/science.7973631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Joosten M. H., Cozijnsen T. J., De Wit P. J. Host resistance to a fungal tomato pathogen lost by a single base-pair change in an avirulence gene. Nature. 1994 Jan 27;367(6461):384–386. doi: 10.1038/367384a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Keen N. T. Gene-for-gene complementarity in plant-pathogen interactions. Annu Rev Genet. 1990;24:447–463. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.002311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kobe B., Deisenhofer J. The leucine-rich repeat: a versatile binding motif. Trends Biochem Sci. 1994 Oct;19(10):415–421. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90090-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lamb C. J., Lawton M. A., Dron M., Dixon R. A. Signals and transduction mechanisms for activation of plant defenses against microbial attack. Cell. 1989 Jan 27;56(2):215–224. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90894-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lamb C. J. Plant disease resistance genes in signal perception and transduction. Cell. 1994 Feb 11;76(3):419–422. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90106-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lawrence G. J., Finnegan E. J., Ayliffe M. A., Ellis J. G. The L6 gene for flax rust resistance is related to the Arabidopsis bacterial resistance gene RPS2 and the tobacco viral resistance gene N. Plant Cell. 1995 Aug;7(8):1195–1206. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.8.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Levine A., Pennell R. I., Alvarez M. E., Palmer R., Lamb C. Calcium-mediated apoptosis in a plant hypersensitive disease resistance response. Curr Biol. 1996 Apr 1;6(4):427–437. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00510-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Padgett H. S., Beachy R. N. Analysis of a tobacco mosaic virus strain capable of overcoming N gene-mediated resistance. Plant Cell. 1993 May;5(5):577–586. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.5.577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Parker J. E., Coleman M. J., Szabò V., Frost L. N., Schmidt R., van der Biezen E. A., Moores T., Dean C., Daniels M. J., Jones J. D. The Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP5 shares similarity to the toll and interleukin-1 receptors with N and L6. Plant Cell. 1997 Jun;9(6):879–894. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.6.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Parker J. E., Holub E. B., Frost L. N., Falk A., Gunn N. D., Daniels M. J. Characterization of eds1, a mutation in Arabidopsis suppressing resistance to Peronospora parasitica specified by several different RPP genes. Plant Cell. 1996 Nov;8(11):2033–2046. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.11.2033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rommens C. M., Salmeron J. M., Baulcombe D. C., Staskawicz B. J. Use of a gene expression system based on potato virus X to rapidly identify and characterize a tomato Pto homolog that controls fenthion sensitivity. Plant Cell. 1995 Mar;7(3):249–257. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.3.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ryals J. A., Neuenschwander U. H., Willits M. G., Molina A., Steiner H. Y., Hunt M. D. Systemic Acquired Resistance. Plant Cell. 1996 Oct;8(10):1809–1819. doi: 10.1105/tpc.8.10.1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Salmeron J. M., Oldroyd G. E., Rommens C. M., Scofield S. R., Kim H. S., Lavelle D. T., Dahlbeck D., Staskawicz B. J. Tomato Prf is a member of the leucine-rich repeat class of plant disease resistance genes and lies embedded within the Pto kinase gene cluster. Cell. 1996 Jul 12;86(1):123–133. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80083-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Scofield SR, Tobias CM, Rathjen JP, Chang JH, Lavelle DT, Michelmore RW, Staskawicz BJ. Molecular Basis of Gene-for-Gene Specificity in Bacterial Speck Disease of Tomato. Science. 1996 Dec 20;274(5295):2063–2065. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5295.2063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tang X, Frederick RD, Zhou J, Halterman DA, Jia Y, Martin GB. Initiation of Plant Disease Resistance by Physical Interaction of AvrPto and Pto Kinase. Science. 1996 Dec 20;274(5295):2060–2063. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5295.2060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thilmony R. L., Chen Z., Bressan R. A., Martin G. B. Expression of the Tomato Pto Gene in Tobacco Enhances Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv tabaci Expressing avrPto. Plant Cell. 1995 Oct;7(10):1529–1536. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.10.1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Whitham S., Dinesh-Kumar S. P., Choi D., Hehl R., Corr C., Baker B. The product of the tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N: similarity to toll and the interleukin-1 receptor. Cell. 1994 Sep 23;78(6):1101–1115. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90283-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Whitham S., McCormick S., Baker B. The N gene of tobacco confers resistance to tobacco mosaic virus in transgenic tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8776–8781. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES