Skip to main content
PMC home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Jul 29;354(1387):1135–1144. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0469

Functionally independent components of early event-related potentials in a visual spatial attention task.

S Makeig 1, M Westerfield 1, J Townsend 1, T P Jung 1, E Courchesne 1, T J Sejnowski 1
PMCID: PMC1692642  PMID: 10466141

Abstract

Spatial visual attention modulates the first negative-going deflection in the human averaged event-related potential (ERP) in response to visual target and non-target stimuli (the N1 complex). Here we demonstrate a decomposition of N1 into functionally independent subcomponents with functionally distinct relations to task and stimulus conditions. ERPs were collected from 20 subjects in response to visual target and non-target stimuli presented at five attended and non-attended screen locations. Independent component analysis, a new method for blind source separation, was trained simultaneously on 500 ms grand average responses from all 25 stimulus-attention conditions and decomposed the non-target N1 complexes into five spatially fixed, temporally independent and physiologically plausible components. Activity of an early, laterally symmetrical component pair (N1aR and N1aL) was evoked by the left and right visual field stimuli, respectively. Component N1aR peaked ca. 9 ms earlier than N1aL. Central stimuli evoked both components with the same peak latency difference, producing a bilateral scalp distribution. The amplitudes of these components were no reliably augmented by spatial attention. Stimuli in the right visual field evoked activity in a spatio-temporally overlapping bilateral component (N1b) that peaked at ca. 180 ms and was strongly enhanced by attention. Stimuli presented at unattended locations evoked a fourth component (P2a) peaking near 240 ms. A fifth component (P3f) was evoked only by targets presented in either visual field. The distinct response patterns of these components across the array of stimulus and attention conditions suggest that they reflect activity in functionally independent brain systems involved in processing attended and unattended visuospatial events.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (786.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anllo-Vento L., Hillyard S. A. Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection. Percept Psychophys. 1996 Feb;58(2):191–206. doi: 10.3758/bf03211875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell A. J., Sejnowski T. J. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 1995 Nov;7(6):1129–1159. doi: 10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bell A. J., Sejnowski T. J. Learning the higher-order structure of a natural sound. Network. 1996 May;7(2):261–267. doi: 10.1088/0954-898X/7/2/005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown W. S., Larson E. B., Jeeves M. A. Directional asymmetries in interhemispheric transmission time: evidence from visual evoked potentials. Neuropsychologia. 1994 Apr;32(4):439–448. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90089-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Corbetta M., Akbudak E., Conturo T. E., Snyder A. Z., Ollinger J. M., Drury H. A., Linenweber M. R., Petersen S. E., Raichle M. E., Van Essen D. C. A common network of functional areas for attention and eye movements. Neuron. 1998 Oct;21(4):761–773. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80593-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Corbetta M., Miezin F. M., Shulman G. L., Petersen S. E. A PET study of visuospatial attention. J Neurosci. 1993 Mar;13(3):1202–1226. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-03-01202.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donchin E. A multivariate approach to the analysis of average evoked potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1966 Jul;13(3):131–139. doi: 10.1109/tbme.1966.4502423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gilbert C. D. Adult cortical dynamics. Physiol Rev. 1998 Apr;78(2):467–485. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.2.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hillyard S. A., Anllo-Vento L. Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):781–787. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ipata A., Girelli M., Miniussi C., Marzi C. A. Interhemispheric transfer of visual information in humans: the role of different callosal channels. Arch Ital Biol. 1997 Mar;135(2):169–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kotchoubey B., Wascher E., Verleger R. Shifting attention between global features and small details: an event-related potential study. Biol Psychol. 1997 Jun 20;46(1):25–50. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0511(96)05236-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee T. W., Girolami M., Sejnowski T. J. Independent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources. Neural Comput. 1999 Feb 15;11(2):417–441. doi: 10.1162/089976699300016719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Makeig S. Auditory event-related dynamics of the EEG spectrum and effects of exposure to tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Apr;86(4):283–293. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90110-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Makeig S., Westerfield M., Jung T. P., Covington J., Townsend J., Sejnowski T. J., Courchesne E. Functionally independent components of the late positive event-related potential during visual spatial attention. J Neurosci. 1999 Apr 1;19(7):2665–2680. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02665.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mangun G. R., Hillyard S. A. Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Nov;17(4):1057–1074. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.4.1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McKeown M. J., Makeig S., Brown G. G., Jung T. P., Kindermann S. S., Bell A. J., Sejnowski T. J. Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum Brain Mapp. 1998;6(3):160–188. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:3<160::AID-HBM5>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mesulam M. M. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol. 1981 Oct;10(4):309–325. doi: 10.1002/ana.410100402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Neville H. J., Lawson D. Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I. Normal hearing adults. Brain Res. 1987 Mar 10;405(2):253–267. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90295-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology. 1987 Jul;24(4):375–425. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. O'Donnell B. F., Swearer J. M., Smith L. T., Hokama H., McCarley R. W. A topographic study of ERPs elicited by visual feature discrimination. Brain Topogr. 1997 Winter;10(2):133–143. doi: 10.1023/a:1022203811678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Saron C. D., Davidson R. J. Visual evoked potential measures of interhemispheric transfer time in humans. Behav Neurosci. 1989 Oct;103(5):1115–1138. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.103.5.1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Valdes-Sosa M., Bobes M. A., Rodriguez V., Pinilla T. Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Jan;10(1):137–151. doi: 10.1162/089892998563743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES