Skip to main content
PMC home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Jan 29;355(1393):21–35. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0547

On variability in the density of corticocortical and thalamocortical connections.

J W Scannell 1, S Grant 1, B R Payne 1, R Baddeley 1
PMCID: PMC1692721  PMID: 10703042

Abstract

Variability is an important but neglected aspect of connectional neuroanatomy. The quantitative density of the 'same' corticocortical or thalamocortical connection may vary by over two orders of magnitude between different injections of the same tracer. At present, however, the frequency distribution of connection densities is unknown. Therefore, it is unclear what kind of sampling strategies or statistical methods are appropriate for quantitative studies of connectivity. Nor is it clear if the measured variability represents differences between subjects, or if it is simply a consequence of intra-individual differences resulting from experimental technique and the exact placement of tracers relative to local spatial and laminar variation in connectivity. We used quantitative measurements of the density of a large number of corticocortical and thalamocortical connections from our own laboratories and from the literature. Variability in the density of given corticocortical and thalamocortical connections is high, with the standard deviation of density proportional to the mean. The frequency distribution is close to exponential. Therefore, analysis methods relying on the normal distribution are not appropriate. We provide an appendix that gives simple statistical guidance for samples drawn from exponentially distributed data. For a given corticocortical or thalamocortical connection density, between-individual standard deviation is 0.85 to 1.25 times the within-individual standard deviation. Therefore, much of the variability reported in conventional neuroanatomical studies (with one tracer deposited per animal) is due to within-individual factors. We also find that strong, but not weak, corticocortical connections are substantially more variable than thalamocortical connections. We propose that the near exponential distribution of connection densities is a simple consequence of 'patchy' connectivity. We anticipate that connection data will be well described by the negative binomial, a class of distribution that applies to events occurring in clumped or patchy substrates. Local patchiness may be a feature of all corticocortical connections and could explain why strong corticocortical connections are more variable than strong thalamocortical connections. This idea is supported by the columnar patterns of many corticocortical but few thalamocortical connections in the literature.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (444.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cowan W. M., Gottlieb D. I., Hendrickson A. E., Price J. L., Woolsey T. A. The autoradiographic demonstration of axonal connections in the central nervous system. Brain Res. 1972 Feb 11;37(1):21–51. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90344-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DeYoe E. A., Van Essen D. C. Segregation of efferent connections and receptive field properties in visual area V2 of the macaque. Nature. 1985 Sep 5;317(6032):58–61. doi: 10.1038/317058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Felleman D. J., Van Essen D. C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 1991 Jan-Feb;1(1):1–47. doi: 10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gerfen C. R., Sawchenko P. E. An anterograde neuroanatomical tracing method that shows the detailed morphology of neurons, their axons and terminals: immunohistochemical localization of an axonally transported plant lectin, Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L). Brain Res. 1984 Jan 9;290(2):219–238. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90940-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grant S., Shipp S. Visuotopic organization of the lateral suprasylvian area and of an adjacent area of the ectosylvian gyrus of cat cortex: a physiological and connectional study. Vis Neurosci. 1991 Apr;6(4):315–338. doi: 10.1017/s0952523800006568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kristensson K., Olsson Y., Sjöstrand J. Axonal uptake and retrograde transport of exogenous proteins in the hypoglossal nerve. Brain Res. 1971 Sep 24;32(2):399–406. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90332-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MacNeil M. A., Lomber S. G., Payne B. R. Thalamic and cortical projections to middle suprasylvian cortex of cats: constancy and variation. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Mar;114(1):24–32. doi: 10.1007/pl00005620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Montero V. M. Topography of the cortico-cortical connections from the striate cortex in the cat. Brain Behav Evol. 1981;18(4):194–218. doi: 10.1159/000121787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Musil S. Y., Olson C. R. Cortical areas in the medial frontal lobe of the cat delineated by quantitative analysis of thalamic afferents. J Comp Neurol. 1991 Jun 15;308(3):457–466. doi: 10.1002/cne.903080311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Musil S. Y., Olson C. R. Organization of cortical and subcortical projections to anterior cingulate cortex in the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1988 Jun 8;272(2):203–218. doi: 10.1002/cne.902720205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Musil S. Y., Olson C. R. Organization of cortical and subcortical projections to medial prefrontal cortex in the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1988 Jun 8;272(2):219–241. doi: 10.1002/cne.902720206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. NAUTA W. J., GYGAX P. A. Silver impregnation of degenerating axons in the central nervous system: a modified technic. Stain Technol. 1954 Mar;29(2):91–93. doi: 10.3109/10520295409115448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Olson C. R., Musil S. Y. Topographic organization of cortical and subcortical projections to posterior cingulate cortex in the cat: evidence for somatic, ocular, and complex subregions. J Comp Neurol. 1992 Oct 8;324(2):237–260. doi: 10.1002/cne.903240207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Raczkowski D., Rosenquist A. C. Connections of the multiple visual cortical areas with the lateral posterior-pulvinar complex and adjacent thalamic nuclei in the cat. J Neurosci. 1983 Oct;3(10):1912–1942. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.03-10-01912.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Scannell J. W., Blakemore C., Young M. P. Analysis of connectivity in the cat cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 1995 Feb;15(2):1463–1483. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-02-01463.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Scannell J. W. Determining cortical landscapes. Nature. 1997 Apr 3;386(6624):452–452. doi: 10.1038/386452a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shaw D. J., Grenfell B. T., Dobson A. P. Patterns of macroparasite aggregation in wildlife host populations. Parasitology. 1998 Dec;117(Pt 6):597–610. doi: 10.1017/s0031182098003448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sherk H. Coincidence of patchy inputs from the lateral geniculate complex and area 17 to the cat's Clare-Bishop area. J Comp Neurol. 1986 Nov 1;253(1):105–120. doi: 10.1002/cne.902530109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sherk H., Ombrellaro M. The retinotopic match between area 17 and its targets in visual suprasylvian cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1988;72(2):225–236. doi: 10.1007/BF00250246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shipp S., Grant S. Organization of reciprocal connections between area 17 and the lateral suprasylvian area of cat visual cortex. Vis Neurosci. 1991 Apr;6(4):339–355. doi: 10.1017/s095252380000657x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Stear M. J., Bairden K., Bishop S. C., Gettinby G., McKellar Q. A., Park M., Strain S., Wallace D. S. The processes influencing the distribution of parasitic nematodes among naturally infected lambs. Parasitology. 1998 Aug;117(Pt 2):165–171. doi: 10.1017/s0031182098002868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Symonds L. L., Rosenquist A. C. Corticocortical connections among visual areas in the cat. J Comp Neurol. 1984 Oct 10;229(1):1–38. doi: 10.1002/cne.902290103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Young M. P. The organization of neural systems in the primate cerebral cortex. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Apr 22;252(1333):13–18. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Zeki S., Shipp S. Modular Connections between Areas V2 and V4 of Macaque Monkey Visual Cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 1989;1(5):494–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00356.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zeki S., Shipp S. The functional logic of cortical connections. Nature. 1988 Sep 22;335(6188):311–317. doi: 10.1038/335311a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES