Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Sep 29;355(1401):1277–1280. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0683

Hair cell heterogeneity and ultrasonic hearing: recent advances in understanding fish hearing.

A N Popper 1
PMCID: PMC1692857  PMID: 11079414

Abstract

The past decade has seen a wealth of new data on the auditory capabilities and mechanisms of fishes. We now have a significantly better appreciation of the structure and function of the auditory system in fishes with regard to their peripheral and central anatomy, physiology, behaviour, sound source localization and hearing capabilities. This paper deals with two of the newest of these findings, hair cell heterogeneity and the detection of ultrasound. As a result of this recent work, we now know that fishes have several different types of sensory hair cells in both the ear and lateral line and there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that these hair cell types arose very early in the evolution of the octavolateralis system. There is also some evidence to suggest that the differences in the hair cell types have functional implications for the way the ear and lateral line of fishes detect and process stimuli. Behavioural studies have shown that, whereas most fishes can only detect sound to 1-3 kHz, several species of the genus Alosa (Clupeiformes, i.e. herrings and their relatives) can detect sounds up to 180 kHz (or even higher). It is suggested that this capability evolved so that these fishes can detect one of their major predators, echolocating dolphins. The mechanism for ultrasound detection remains obscure, though it is hypothesized that the highly derived utricle of the inner ear in these species is involved.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (158.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chang J. S., Popper A. N., Saidel W. M. Heterogeneity of sensory hair cells in a fish ear. J Comp Neurol. 1992 Oct 22;324(4):621–640. doi: 10.1002/cne.903240413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoshino T. An electron microscopic study of the otolithic maculae of the lamprey (Entosphenus japonicus). Acta Otolaryngol. 1975 Jul-Aug;80(1-2):43–53. doi: 10.3109/00016487509121299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jacobs D. W., Tavolga W. N. Acoustic intensity limens in the goldfish. Anim Behav. 1967 Apr-Jul;15(2):324–335. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(67)90019-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lanford P. J., Platt C., Popper A. N. Structure and function in the saccule of the goldfish (Carassius auratus): a model of diversity in the non-amniote ear. Hear Res. 2000 May;143(1-2):1–13. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00015-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lanford P. J., Popper A. N. Novel afferent terminal structure in the crista ampullaris of the goldfish, carassius auratus. J Comp Neurol. 1996 Mar 18;366(4):572–579. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960318)366:4<572::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mann D. A., Lu Z., Hastings M. C., Popper A. N. Detection of ultrasonic tones and simulated dolphin echolocation clicks by a teleost fish, the American shad (Alosa sapidissima). J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jul;104(1):562–568. doi: 10.1121/1.423255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Popper A. N., Fay R. R. Evolution of the ear and hearing: issues and questions. Brain Behav Evol. 1997;50(4):213–221. doi: 10.1159/000113335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Saidel W. M., Lanford P. J., Yan H. Y., Popper A. N. Hair cell heterogeneity in the goldfish saccule. Brain Behav Evol. 1995;46(6):362–370. doi: 10.1159/000113286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Saidel W. M., Presson J. C., Chang J. S. S-100 immunoreactivity identifies a subset of hair cells in the utricle and saccule of a fish. Hear Res. 1990 Aug 1;47(1-2):139–146. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90171-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Song J., Yan H. Y., Popper A. N. Damage and recovery of hair cells in fish canal (but not superficial) neuromasts after gentamicin exposure. Hear Res. 1995 Nov;91(1-2):63–71. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00170-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yan H. Y., Saidel W. M., Chang J. S., Presson J. C., Popper A. N. Sensory hair cells of a fish ear: evidence of multiple types based on ototoxicity sensitivity. Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Aug 22;245(1313):133–138. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES