Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Oct 29;355(1402):1489–1498. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0709

An evaluation of the potential triggers of photoinactivation of photosystem II in the context of a Stern-Volmer model for downregulation and the reversible radical pair equilibrium model.

K Oxborough 1, N R Baker 1
PMCID: PMC1692881  PMID: 11128002

Abstract

Photoinactivation of photosystem II (PS II) is a light-dependent process that frequently leads to break-down and replacement of the D1 polypeptide. Photoinhibition occurs when the rate of photoinactivation is greater than the rate at which D1 is replaced and results in a decrease in the maximum efficiency of PS II photochemistry. Downregulation, which increases non-radiative decay within PS II, also decreases the maximum efficiency of PS II photochemistry and plays an important role in protecting against photoinhibition by reducing the yield of photoinactivation. The yield of photoinactivation has been shown to be relatively insensitive to photosynthetically active photon flux density (PPFD). Formation of the P680 radical (P680+), through charge separation at PS II, generation of triplet-state P680 (3P680*), through intersystem crossing and charge recombination, and double reduction of the primary stable electron acceptor of PS II (the plastoquinone, Q(A)) are all potentially critical steps in the triggering of photoinactivation. In this paper, these processes are assessed using fluorescence data from attached leaves of higher plant species, in the context of a Stern-Volmer model for downregulation and the reversible radical pair equilibrium model. It is shown that the yield of P680+ is very sensitive to PPFD and that downregulation has very little effect on its production. Consequently, it is unlikely to be the trigger for photoinactivation. The yields of 3P680* generated through charge recombination or intersystem crossing are both less sensitive to PPFD than the yield of P680+ and are both decreased by down regulation. The yield of doubly reduced Q(A) increases with incident photon flux density at low levels, but is relatively insensitive at moderate to high levels, and is greatly decreased by downregulation. Consequently, 3P680* and doubly reduced Q(A) are both viable as triggers of photoinactivation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (293.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barber J. Photosystem two. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Jun 10;1365(1-2):269–277. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2728(98)00079-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler W. L., Kitajima M. Fluorescence quenching in photosystem II of chloroplasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Jan 31;376(1):116–125. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(75)90210-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Duncan M. R., Robinson M. J., Dell'Orco R. T. Kinetics of histone hyperacetylation and deacetylation in human diploid fibroblasts. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983 Apr 5;762(2):221–226. doi: 10.1016/0167-4889(83)90074-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. JOLIOT A., JOLIOT P. ETUDE CIN'ETIQUE DE LA R'EACTION PHOTOCHIMIQUE LIB'ERANT L'OXYG'ENE AU COURS DE LA PHOTOSYNTH'ESE. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci. 1964 May 4;258:4622–4625. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones L. W., Kok B. Photoinhibition of chloroplast reactions. I. Kinetics and action spectra. Plant Physiol. 1966 Jun;41(6):1037–1043. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.6.1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Laible P. D., Zipfel W., Owens T. G. Excited state dynamics in chlorophyll-based antennae: the role of transfer equilibrium. Biophys J. 1994 Mar;66(3 Pt 1):844–860. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(94)80861-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Laisk A., Oja V., Rasulov B., Eichelmann H., Sumberg A. Quantum Yields and Rate Constants of Photochemical and Nonphotochemical Excitation Quenching (Experiment and Model). Plant Physiol. 1997 Oct;115(2):803–815. doi: 10.1104/pp.115.2.803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lavergne J., Trissl H. W. Theory of fluorescence induction in photosystem II: derivation of analytical expressions in a model including exciton-radical-pair equilibrium and restricted energy transfer between photosynthetic units. Biophys J. 1995 Jun;68(6):2474–2492. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80429-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Park Y., Chow W. S., Anderson J. M. Antenna Size Dependency of Photoinactivation of Photosystem II in Light-Acclimated Pea Leaves. Plant Physiol. 1997 Sep;115(1):151–157. doi: 10.1104/pp.115.1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Poulson M., Samson G., Whitmarsh J. Evidence that cytochrome b559 protects photosystem II against photoinhibition. Biochemistry. 1995 Aug 29;34(34):10932–10938. doi: 10.1021/bi00034a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roelofs T. A., Lee C. H., Holzwarth A. R. Global target analysis of picosecond chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics from pea chloroplasts: A new approach to the characterization of the primary processes in photosystem II alpha- and beta-units. Biophys J. 1992 May;61(5):1147–1163. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(92)81924-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schatz G. H., Brock H., Holzwarth A. R. Kinetic and Energetic Model for the Primary Processes in Photosystem II. Biophys J. 1988 Sep;54(3):397–405. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)82973-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shinkarev V. P., Govindjee Insight into the relationship of chlorophyll a fluorescence yield to the concentration of its natural quenchers in oxygenic photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 15;90(16):7466–7469. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.16.7466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shipton C. A., Barber J. Photoinduced degradation of the D1 polypeptide in isolated reaction centers of photosystem II: evidence for an autoproteolytic process triggered by the oxidizing side of the photosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 1;88(15):6691–6695. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vass I., Styring S., Hundal T., Koivuniemi A., Aro E., Andersson B. Reversible and irreversible intermediates during photoinhibition of photosystem II: stable reduced QA species promote chlorophyll triplet formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 15;89(4):1408–1412. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.4.1408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. van Mieghem F., Brettel K., Hillmann B., Kamlowski A., Rutherford A. W., Schlodder E. Charge recombination reactions in photosystem II. I. Yields, recombination pathways, and kinetics of the primary pair. Biochemistry. 1995 Apr 11;34(14):4798–4813. doi: 10.1021/bi00014a038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES