Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):251–257. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0932

Phylogenetic reconstruction of parental-care systems in the ancestors of birds.

Birgitta S Tullberg 1, Malin Ah-King 1, Hans Temrin 1
PMCID: PMC1692941  PMID: 11958694

Abstract

Due to the controversy surrounding incipient avian parental care, ancestral parental care systems were reconstructed in a phylogeny including major extant amniote lineages. Using two different resolutions for the basal avian branches, transitions between the states no care, female care, biparental care and male care were inferred for the most basal branches of the tree. Uniparental female care was inferred for the lineage to birds and crocodiles. Using a phylogeny where ratites and tinamous branch off early and an ordered character-state assumption, a transition to biparental care was inferred for the ancestor of birds. This ancestor could be any organism along the lineage leading from the crocodile-bird split up to modern birds, not necessarily the original bird. We discuss the support for alternative avian phylogenies and the homology in parental care between crocodiles and birds. We suggest that the phylogenetic pattern should be used as a starting point for a more detailed analysis of parental care systems in birds and their relatives.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (178.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brochu C. A. Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis. Syst Biol. 1997 Sep;46(3):479–522. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/46.3.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burley Nancy Tyler, Johnson Kristine. The evolution of avian parental care. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):241–250. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Groth J. G., Barrowclough G. F. Basal divergences in birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1999 Jul;12(2):115–123. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Härlid A., Janke A., Arnason U. The complete mitochondrial genome of Rhea americana and early avian divergences. J Mol Evol. 1998 Jun;46(6):669–679. doi: 10.1007/pl00006347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kornegay J. R., Kocher T. D., Williams L. A., Wilson A. C. Pathways of lysozyme evolution inferred from the sequences of cytochrome b in birds. J Mol Evol. 1993 Oct;37(4):367–379. doi: 10.1007/BF00178867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mindell D. P., Sorenson M. D., Dimcheff D. E., Hasegawa M., Ast J. C., Yuri T. Interordinal relationships of birds and other reptiles based on whole mitochondrial genomes. Syst Biol. 1999 Mar;48(1):138–152. doi: 10.1080/106351599260490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  10. van Tuinen M., Sibley C. G., Hedges S. B. The early history of modern birds inferred from DNA sequences of nuclear and mitochondrial ribosomal genes. Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Mar;17(3):451–457. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES