Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Mar 29;357(1419):259–267. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0958

Life-history correlates of the evolution of live bearing in fishes.

Nicholas B Goodwin 1, Nicholas K Dulvy 1, John D Reynolds 1
PMCID: PMC1692945  PMID: 11958695

Abstract

Selection for live bearing is thought to occur when the benefits of increasing offspring survival exceed the costs of reduced fecundity, mobility and the increased metabolic demands of carrying offspring throughout development. We present evidence that live bearing has evolved from egg laying 12 times in teleost (bony) fishes, bringing the total number of transitions to 21 to 22 times in all fishes, including elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). Live bearers produce larger offspring than egg layers in all of 13 independent comparisons for which data were available. However, contrary to our expectation there has not been a consistent reduction in fecundity; live bearers have fewer offspring in seven out of the 11 available comparisons. It was predicted that live bearers would have a larger body size, as this facilitates accommodation of developing offspring. This prediction was upheld in 14 out of 20 comparisons. However, this trend was driven by elasmobranchs, with large live bearers in seven out of eight comparisons. Thus, while the evolution of live bearing in elasmobranchs is correlated with predicted increases in offspring size and adult size, teleost live bearers do not have such a consistent suite of life-history correlates. This suggests that constraints or selection pressures on associated life histories may differ in live-bearing elasmobranchs and teleost fishes.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (115.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amoroso E. C. The evolution of viviparity. Proc R Soc Med. 1968 Nov;61(11 Pt 2):1188–1200. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Maddison W. P. Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. J Theor Biol. 2000 Feb 7;202(3):195–204. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Meyer A., Lydeard C. The evolution of copulatory organs, internal fertilization, placentae and viviparity in killifishes (Cyprinodontiformes) inferred from a DNA phylogeny of the tyrosine kinase gene X-src. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Nov 22;254(1340):153–162. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shine R. Propagule size and parental care: the "safe harbor" hypothesis. J Theor Biol. 1978 Dec 21;75(4):417–424. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(78)90353-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Slobodyanyuk SJa, Kirilchik S. V., Pavlova M. E., Belikov S. I., Novitsky A. L. The evolutionary relationships of two families of cottoid fishes of Lake Baikal (east Siberia) as suggested by analysis of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1995 Apr;40(4):392–399. doi: 10.1007/BF00164025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Streelman J. T., Karl S. A. Reconstructing labroid evolution with single-copy nuclear DNA. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Jul 22;264(1384):1011–1020. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tohyama Y., Ichimiya T., Kasama-Yoshida H., Cao Y., Hasegawa M., Kojima H., Tamai Y., Kurihara T. Phylogenetic relation of lungfish indicated by the amino acid sequence of myelin DM20. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2000 Sep 15;80(2):256–259. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(00)00143-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES