Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Apr 29;357(1420):471–492. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1059

Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation.

Michele Drès 1, James Mallet 1
PMCID: PMC1692958  PMID: 12028786

Abstract

The existence of a continuous array of sympatric biotypes - from polymorphisms, through ecological or host races with increasing reproductive isolation, to good species - can provide strong evidence for a continuous route to sympatric speciation via natural selection. Host races in plant-feeding insects, in particular, have often been used as evidence for the probability of sympatric speciation. Here, we provide verifiable criteria to distinguish host races from other biotypes: in brief, host races are genetically differentiated, sympatric populations of parasites that use different hosts and between which there is appreciable gene flow. We recognize host races as kinds of species that regularly exchange genes with other species at a rate of more than ca. 1% per generation, rather than as fundamentally distinct taxa. Host races provide a convenient, although admittedly somewhat arbitrary intermediate stage along the speciation continuum. They are a heuristic device to aid in evaluating the probability of speciation by natural selection, particularly in sympatry. Speciation is thereby envisaged as having two phases: (i) the evolution of host races from within polymorphic, panmictic populations; and (ii) further reduction of gene flow between host races until the diverging populations can become generally accepted as species. We apply this criterion to 21 putative host race systems. Of these, only three are unambiguously classified as host races, but a further eight are strong candidates that merely lack accurate information on rates of hybridization or gene flow. Thus, over one-half of the cases that we review are probably or certainly host races, under our definition. Our review of the data favours the idea of sympatric speciation via host shift for three major reasons: (i) the evolution of assortative mating as a pleiotropic by-product of adaptation to a new host seems likely, even in cases where mating occurs away from the host; (ii) stable genetic differences in half of the cases attest to the power of natural selection to maintain multilocus polymorphisms with substantial linkage disequilibrium, in spite of probable gene flow; and (iii) this linkage disequilibrium should permit additional host adaptation, leading to further reproductive isolation via pleiotropy, and also provides conditions suitable for adaptive evolution of mate choice (reinforcement) to cause still further reductions in gene flow. Current data are too sparse to rule out a cryptic discontinuity in the apparently stable sympatric route from host-associated polymorphism to host-associated species, but such a hiatus seems unlikely on present evidence. Finally, we discuss applications of an understanding of host races in conservation and in managing adaptation by pests to control strategies, including those involving biological control or transgenic parasite-resistant plants.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (228.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barraclough TG, Vogler AP. Detecting the Geographical Pattern of Speciation from Species-Level Phylogenies. Am Nat. 2000 Apr;155(4):419–434. doi: 10.1086/303332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlocher S. H. Host race or species? Allozyme characterization of the 'flowering dogwood fly', a member of the Rhagoletis pomonella complex. Heredity (Edinb) 1999 Dec;83(Pt 6):652–662. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00591.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berlocher S. H. Radiation and divergence in the Rhagoletis pomonella species group: inferences from allozymes. Evolution. 2000 Apr;54(2):543–557. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00057.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berlocher Stewart H., Feder Jeffrey L. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annu Rev Entomol. 2002;47:773–815. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourguet D., Bethenod M. T., Trouvé C., Viard F. Host-plant diversity of the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis: what value for sustainable transgenic insecticidal Bt maize? Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jun 22;267(1449):1177–1184. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Butlin R. K. Divergence in emergence time of host races due to differential gene flow. Heredity (Edinb) 1990 Aug;65(Pt 1):47–50. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1990.68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Coyne J. A., Crittenden A. P., Mah K. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science. 1994 Sep 2;265(5177):1461–1464. doi: 10.1126/science.8073292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Craig T. P., Horner J. D., Itami J. K. Genetics, experience, and host-plant preference in Eurosta solidaginis: implications for host shifts and speciation. Evolution. 2001 Apr;55(4):773–782. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0773:geahpp]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds OR, Mace GM, Wayne RK. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jul;15(7):290–295. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01876-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dieckmann U., Doebeli M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature. 1999 Jul 22;400(6742):354–357. doi: 10.1038/22521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Emelianov I., Drès M., Baltensweiler W., Mallet J. Host-induced assortative mating in host races of the larch budmoth. Evolution. 2001 Oct;55(10):2002–2010. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Farrell BD. "Inordinate Fondness" explained: why are there So many beetles? . Science. 1998 Jul 24;281(5376):555–559. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5376.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Feder J. L., Opp S. B., Wlazlo B., Reynolds K., Go W., Spisak S. Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 16;91(17):7990–7994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.7990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferveur J. F. The pheromonal role of cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila melanogaster. Bioessays. 1997 Apr;19(4):353–358. doi: 10.1002/bies.950190413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Filchak K. E., Roethele J. B., Feder J. L. Natural selection and sympatric divergence in the apple maggot Rhagoletis pomonella. Nature. 2000 Oct 12;407(6805):739–742. doi: 10.1038/35037578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibbs H. L., Sorenson M. D., Marchetti K., Brooke M. D., Davies N. B., Nakamura H. Genetic evidence for female host-specific races of the common cuckoo. Nature. 2000 Sep 14;407(6801):183–186. doi: 10.1038/35025058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gould F. Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology. Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:701–726. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.43.1.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Grant P. R., Grant B. R. Hybridization of bird species. Science. 1992 Apr 10;256(5054):193–197. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5054.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hawthorne D. J., Via S. Genetic linkage of ecological specialization and reproductive isolation in pea aphids. Nature. 2001 Aug 30;412(6850):904–907. doi: 10.1038/35091062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jiggins CD, Mallet J. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jun;15(6):250–255. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01873-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kliman R. M., Andolfatto P., Coyne J. A., Depaulis F., Kreitman M., Berry A. J., McCarter J., Wakeley J., Hey J. The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1913–1931. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kondrashov A. S., Kondrashov F. A. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature. 1999 Jul 22;400(6742):351–354. doi: 10.1038/22514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Marchetti K, Nakamura H, Gibbs HL. Host-race formation in the common cuckoo . Science. 1998 Oct 16;282(5388):471–472. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5388.471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Noor M. A. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity (Edinb) 1999 Nov;83(Pt 5):503–508. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6886320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. O'brien S. J., Mayr E. Bureaucratic mischief: recognizing endangered species and subspecies. Science. 1991 Mar 8;251(4998):1187–1188. doi: 10.1126/science.251.4998.1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schilthuizen M. Dualism and conflicts in understanding speciation. Bioessays. 2000 Dec;22(12):1134–1141. doi: 10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12<1134::AID-BIES11>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schluter D. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):372–380. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02198-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shufran K. A., Burd J. D., Anstead J. A., Lushai G. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence among greenbug (Homoptera: aphididae) biotypes: evidence for host-adapted races. Insect Mol Biol. 2000 Apr;9(2):179–184. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00177.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Smiley J. Plant chemistry and the evolution of host specificity: new evidence from heliconius and passiflora. Science. 1978 Aug 25;201(4357):745–747. doi: 10.1126/science.201.4357.745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith J. J., Bush G. L. Phylogeny of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae) inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997 Feb;7(1):33–43. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tregenza T., Butlin R. K. Speciation without isolation. Nature. 1999 Jul 22;400(6742):311–312. doi: 10.1038/22419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tregenza T, Wedell N. Definitive evidence for cuticular pheromones in a cricket. Anim Behav. 1997 Oct;54(4):979–984. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Turelli M., Barton N. H., Coyne J. A. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):330–343. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02177-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Via S., Bouck A. C., Skillman S. Reproductive isolation between divergent races of pea aphids on two hosts. II. Selection against migrants and hybrids in the parental environments. Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1626–1637. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00707.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Via S. Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jul 1;16(7):381–390. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02188-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang J. Y., Chou L. S., White B. N. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of sympatric morphotypes of bottlenose dolphins (genus: Tursiops) in Chinese waters. Mol Ecol. 1999 Oct;8(10):1603–1612. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang R. L., Wakeley J., Hey J. Gene flow and natural selection in the origin of Drosophila pseudoobscura and close relatives. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1091–1106. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wood T. K., Guttman S. I. Enchenopa binotata Complex: Sympatric Speciation? Science. 1983 Apr 15;220(4594):310–312. doi: 10.1126/science.220.4594.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zuber D., Widmer A. Genetic evidence for host specificity in the hemi-parasitic Viscum album L. (Viscaceae). Mol Ecol. 2000 Aug;9(8):1069–1073. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES