Skip to main content
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Jun 29;357(1422):809–813. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1089

The mechanics of cell fate determination in petals.

Cathie Martin 1, Kiran Bhatt 1, Kim Baumann 1, Hailing Jin 1, Sabine Zachgo 1, Keith Roberts 1, Zsuzsanna Schwarz-Sommer 1, Beverley Glover 1, Maria Perez-Rodrigues 1
PMCID: PMC1692987  PMID: 12079676

Abstract

The epidermal cells of petals of many species are specialized, having a pronounced conical shape. A transcription factor, MIXTA, is required for the formation of conical cells in Antirrhinum majus; in shoot epidermal cells of several species, expression of this gene is necessary and sufficient to promote conical cell formation. Ectopic expression has also shown MIXTA to be able to promote the formation of multicellular trichomes, indicating that conical cells and multicellular trichomes share elements of a common developmental pathway. Formation of conical cells or trichomes is also mutually exclusive with stomatal formation. In Antirrhinum, MIXTA normally only promotes conical cell formation on the inner epidermal layer of the petals. Its restricted action in cell fate determination results from its specific expression pattern. Expression of MIXTA, in turn, requires the activity of B-function genes, and biochemical evidence suggests that the products of DEFICIENS, GLOBOSA and SEPALLATA-related genes directly activate MIXTA expression late in petal development, after the completion of cell division in the petal epidermis. A MIXTA-like gene, AmMYBML1, is also expressed in petals. AmMYBML1 expression is high early in petal development. This gene may direct the formation of trichomes in petals. In specifying the fates of different cell types in petals, regulatory genes like MIXTA may have been duplicated. Changes in the timing and spatial localization of expression then provides similar regulatory genes which specify different cell fates.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (7.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Coen E. S., Meyerowitz E. M. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature. 1991 Sep 5;353(6339):31–37. doi: 10.1038/353031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Davies B., Egea-Cortines M., de Andrade Silva E., Saedler H., Sommer H. Multiple interactions amongst floral homeotic MADS box proteins. EMBO J. 1996 Aug 15;15(16):4330–4343. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glover B. J., Perez-Rodriguez M., Martin C. Development of several epidermal cell types can be specified by the same MYB-related plant transcription factor. Development. 1998 Sep;125(17):3497–3508. doi: 10.1242/dev.125.17.3497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gutierrez-Cortines M. E., Davies B. Beyond the ABCs: ternary complex formation in the control of floral organ identity. Trends Plant Sci. 2000 Nov;5(11):471–476. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01761-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hampson Judith. The secret world of animal experiments. New Sci. 1992 Apr 11;134(1816):24–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kolosova N., Sherman D., Karlson D., Dudareva N. Cellular and subcellular localization of S-adenosyl-L-methionine:benzoic acid carboxyl methyltransferase, the enzyme responsible for biosynthesis of the volatile ester methylbenzoate in snapdragon flowers. Plant Physiol. 2001 Jul;126(3):956–964. doi: 10.1104/pp.126.3.956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Noda K., Glover B. J., Linstead P., Martin C. Flower colour intensity depends on specialized cell shape controlled by a Myb-related transcription factor. Nature. 1994 Jun 23;369(6482):661–664. doi: 10.1038/369661a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Payne T., Clement J., Arnold D., Lloyd A. Heterologous myb genes distinct from GL1 enhance trichome production when overexpressed in Nicotiana tabacum. Development. 1999 Feb;126(4):671–682. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.4.671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sommer H., Beltrán J. P., Huijser P., Pape H., Lönnig W. E., Saedler H., Schwarz-Sommer Z. Deficiens, a homeotic gene involved in the control of flower morphogenesis in Antirrhinum majus: the protein shows homology to transcription factors. EMBO J. 1990 Mar;9(3):605–613. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb08152.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tröbner W., Ramirez L., Motte P., Hue I., Huijser P., Lönnig W. E., Saedler H., Sommer H., Schwarz-Sommer Z. GLOBOSA: a homeotic gene which interacts with DEFICIENS in the control of Antirrhinum floral organogenesis. EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(13):4693–4704. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05574.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Weigel D., Meyerowitz E. M. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):203–209. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90291-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES